Coherent Optical Receiver Feedback Control for Polarization and Phase Lock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional coherent optical receivers face operational drawbacks such as manual or complex polarization control, uncontrolled optical path length equalization, non-feedback-controlled coupling ratios, and inadequate phase/frequency lock implementation, which impair their sensitivity and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The development of a multifunctional optical coherent receiver with integrated circuit-based designs, including feedback-controlled avalanche photodiodes, fine phase/frequency lock mechanisms, and autoscan for signal locking, along with internally implemented feedback loops for polarization control and optical coupling, to enhance sensitivity and reliability without relying on erbium doped fiber amplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional coherent optical receivers use manual or complex polarization control, then the system can operate, but the device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesensitivityVSAvoidpolarization control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback-controlled polarization control loops that automatically adjust polarization states based on detected signal characteristics. This replaces manual polarization control with automated feedback mechanisms, reducing operational complexity while maintaining or improving sensitivity through optimized polarization alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-aligning polarization control mechanisms where the receiver automatically adapts to incoming signal polarization states without external intervention. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex manual polarization adjustment while ensuring optimal detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional coherent optical receivers use uncontrolled optical path length equalization, then the system structure is simple, but the manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidoptical path length control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback-controlled optical path length equalization where the system continuously monitors and adjusts optical path differences between signal and local oscillator paths. This feedback mechanism ensures precise path length matching, improving detection reliability while the automated control simplifies the overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conventional coherent optical receivers use non-feedback-controlled coupling ratios, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and sensitivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesensitivityVSAvoidcoupling ratio control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback-controlled coupling ratio adjustment where the system optimizes the coupling between optical signals and photodetectors based on detected performance metrics. This automated feedback control achieves precise coupling ratios that maximize sensitivity while reducing the complexity of manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If conventional coherent optical receivers use inadequate phase/frequency lock implementation, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase and frequency lock precisionVSAvoidphase/frequency lock mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs sophisticated feedback-controlled phase and frequency locking mechanisms that continuously adjust the local oscillator to maintain precise synchronization with the incoming signal. While these mechanisms increase device complexity, they dramatically improve measurement precision and detection reliability, justifying the added complexity through superior performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical phase and frequency adjustment mechanisms with electronic control systems. This substitution allows for more precise and rapid phase/frequency locking while reducing mechanical complexity, achieving high measurement precision through electronic feedback control rather than mechanical adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Reliability

If erbium doped fiber amplification is used to enhance signal strength, then the power consumption and weight increase, but the sensitivity improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detection capabilityVSAvoidreceiver weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the erbium doped fiber amplification stage from the receiver system. Instead of using external amplification, the design relies on optimized coherent detection techniques and feedback control to achieve high sensitivity without the added weight and power consumption of amplification components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves signal enhancement through self-service mechanisms where the coherent detection process itself, combined with feedback control, provides the necessary sensitivity without requiring external amplification. This eliminates dependence on heavy, power-intensive amplification hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves high sensitivity and reliability, enabling detection of low-strength optical signals across various modulation formats and wavelengths, with reduced weight and power consumption, suitable for both free-space and fiber optical links.

Implementation Method 1

feedback-controlled avalanche photodiodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

the received optical signal is mixed with the light of an optical local oscillator (LO). In this way, the signal is down converted from the optical carrier frequency ( ̃200 THz at 1.55 μm) to a microwave carrier frequency (typically a few gigahertz)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoherent detection: Homodyne Detection

Data Source

PatentUS7406269B2Feedback-controlled coherent optical receiver with electrical compensation/equalization
Publication Date: 2008.07.29 DISCOVERY SEMICONDUCTORS INC
  • US7406269B2 patent drawing
  • US7406269B2 patent drawing
  • US7406269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical coherent receiver in one embodiment has a heterodyne configuration, and in another embodiment has a homodyne configuration, in each configuration employs multiple feedback signaling and analog/digital processing to optimize response to a modulated optical input signal, the provision of both individual RF I and RF Q channel outputs.