Coil-Spring Brake Pedal Emulator for e-Boost Force Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transition to e-boost braking systems reduces the need for mechanical braking by operators, but there is still a requirement for resistive feedback when the brake pedal is depressed to indicate the applied braking force.

Innovation Solution

A pedal emulator assembly that includes a pedal arm, a housing with cradles and springs, and an end cap, which generates force feedback through the compression of springs when a load is applied to the pedal arm, simulating the resistance felt in a hydraulic braking system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If e-boost braking system is used to reduce mechanical braking by operator, then braking efficiency is improved, but operator feedback on braking force is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking efficiencyVSAvoidoperator feedback on braking force
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by incorporating springs that provide resistive force to the pedal arm. This resistance gives the operator tactile feedback about the braking force being applied, even though the actual braking is performed by the e-boost system. The springs create a force feedback loop that informs the operator of the system's response to their input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The springs act as an intermediary element between the operator's foot input and the e-boost braking system. They provide a mechanical interface that translates the operator's pedal depression into a form that can be sensed through resistance, bridging the gap between the automated braking system and the operator's need for feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If passive force emulator is added to provide haptic feedback, then operator feedback is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator feedback on braking forceVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-based force emulator is a passive system that automatically provides feedback without requiring active control or additional power sources. The springs self-generate the resistive force based on their mechanical properties and the pedal position, eliminating the need for complex active feedback control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses simple, inexpensive spring elements rather than complex electronic or active mechanical systems to provide the feedback. These springs are basic mechanical components that are cost-effective and reliable, avoiding the need for sophisticated sensors, actuators, or control electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The emulator assembly provides a haptic feel to the operator, allowing them to sense the extent of braking force applied, effectively addressing the need for resistive feedback in e-boost braking systems.

Implementation Method 1

at least a compression energy by the first pair of springs generates a first force feedback onto the pedal arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a first pair of coil springs positioned to extend within the second cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12346145B2Passive pedal force emulator having coil springs
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 KSR IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12346145B2 patent drawing
  • US12346145B2 patent drawing
  • US12346145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a pedal assembly that includes a pedal arm configured to move based on a load applied thereon and a housing that includes a first housing member having a first cavity and a pushrod operably connected to the pedal arm and to the first housing member. A first cradle positioned within the first cavity. The first cradle includes a second cavity. A first pair of springs positioned to extend within the second cavity. A second housing member having a third cavity. A second pair of springs positioned to extend within the second cavity and the third cavity. When a first predetermined load is applied to the pedal arm, the pushrod moves which drives the first cradle against the first pair of springs such that at least a compression energy by the first pair of springs generates a first force feedback onto the pedal arm.