Coil Terminal Structure to Prevent Wire-Substrate Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coil components face issues with wire end portions interfering with substrates due to complex shapes or protruding parts, leading to potential breakage and reduced volume.

Innovation Solution

A coil component design with terminal fittings having wire connecting parts and mounting parts that overlap the flange surfaces, allowing for a gap and springiness to prevent interference and stress relaxation, maintaining a simple shape and volume.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the terminal fitting has a wire connecting part that covers the mounting surface of the flange part, then the wire can be connected to the terminal fitting, but the end portion of the wire interferes with the substrate when the coil component is mounted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire connectionVSAvoidwire interference with substrate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a stepped structure with different height levels (first height and second height) in the flange part. The wire connecting part is positioned at a higher level while the mounting surface is at a lower level, creating vertical separation that prevents wire interference with the substrate while maintaining wire connection functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The flange part is segmented into multiple regions with different heights: a first flange region for wire connection, a second flange region for mounting, and a stepped transition region. This segmentation allows each region to perform its specific function independently without interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a step is formed in the flange part to prevent interference between the wire end portion and the substrate, then wire interference is prevented, but the shape of the drum core becomes complicated and the volume of the drum core is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire interference preventionVSAvoiddrum core shape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding complex lateral protrusions or multi-directional steps, the patent uses a simple axial stepped structure along the winding axis. The first and second flange parts are positioned at different axial locations with different heights, creating interference prevention in the vertical dimension while keeping the overall drum core shape simple and maintaining volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the mounting part of the terminal fitting is separated upward from the flange part to prevent interference, then wire interference is prevented, but the wire connecting part protrudes outward increasing the mounting area and making it more susceptible to external forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire interference preventionVSAvoidwire connecting part durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the wire connecting part in the vertical dimension (axial direction) by creating a first flange part that extends higher than the second flange part, rather than protruding outward in the radial direction. This vertical separation prevents wire interference while keeping the wire connecting part within the overall footprint of the drum core, reducing mounting area and protecting against external forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the wire connecting part protrudes outward in the width direction to separate the mounting part from the flange part, then wire interference is prevented, but the mounting area is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire interference preventionVSAvoidmounting area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prevents wire interference by creating vertical height differences in the axial direction rather than increasing radial protrusions. The first flange part with wire connecting part is positioned at a higher axial level, while the second flange part for mounting remains at a lower level, maintaining a compact radial footprint and minimizing mounting area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents wire-substrate interference without complicating the core shape, enhances mounting reliability, and reduces the risk of breakage by relaxing stress through springiness.

Implementation Method 1

The mounting part has springiness with respect to the drum core... the stress is relaxed by the mounting part having springiness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

stress is applied to the solder due to a difference in thermal expansion coefficient between the drum core and the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS12603220B2Coil component
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 TDK CORP
  • US12603220B2 patent drawing
  • US12603220B2 patent drawing
  • US12603220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a coil component that includes a drum core; a terminal fitting fixed respectively to the flange part of the drum core; and a wire wound around the winding core part of the drum core. The terminal fitting has a wire connecting part to which the wire is connected and a mounting part having springiness with respect to the drum core. The distance between the flange part and the mounting part is larger than the distance between the flange part and the wire connecting part.