Coin Authentication via Unique Microscopic Feature Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for authenticating valuable articles, particularly dense metals like gold, require expensive equipment and expertise, making them inaccessible for convenient authentication by the general public and vulnerable to forgery due to the fine-grained, non-distinguishable random features.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a method where a valuable article is physically transformed using techniques like laser engraving or acid etching to create overt, visible features with macroscopic characteristics and random microscopic features, making them uniquely reproducible, which can be authenticated using simple imaging technology and generating an authentication signature stored in a central database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods (chemical assays, instrumental analysis) are used to authenticate dense metals like gold, then authentication reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly, requiring specialized equipment and expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy (photograph) of the physical feature on the coin surface that can be used for authentication without requiring physical possession of the coin or specialized equipment. The digital representation captures the unique random pattern that serves as an authentication signature, replacing complex physical analysis methods with simple imaging technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical and chemical analysis systems (assays, instrumental analysis) with an optical imaging system. Instead of using chemical reagents or complex instruments to analyze the coin's composition, the system uses a photograph to capture and analyze the unique physical feature pattern on the surface, substituting a simple optical system for complex analytical equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If high magnification is used to capture random features on dense metals, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to requiring expensive imaging equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature distinguishabilityVSAvoidimaging equipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of feature size by creating larger, more coarse random features during the manufacturing process. Instead of relying on naturally occurring fine-grained features that require high magnification, the manufacturing process intentionally creates features with larger dimensions and greater contrast, making them distinguishable at low magnification (about 20 times) using simple imaging equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If natural random features are used for authentication, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability decreases because features are fine-grained and indistinguishable at low magnification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature creation simplicityVSAvoidfeature distinguishability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by intentionally creating the random feature during the manufacturing process itself. The feature is generated as part of the original manufacturing steps (such as casting or forming), ensuring that the feature exists with appropriate size and distinguishability from the beginning, rather than requiring post-manufacturing processing or high-magnification imaging to resolve fine details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If destructive authentication methods are used to determine authenticity, then reliability is improved, but loss of substance occurs and time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidmaterial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent embeds the authentication feature during the preliminary manufacturing stage, creating a permanent, non-destructive identifier that remains with the coin throughout its lifecycle. This eliminates the need for destructive testing later, as the feature can be repeatedly imaged and analyzed without consuming or damaging the coin material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2948930B1Unique identification of coin
Publication Date: 2022.06.15 ROYAL CANADIAN MINT
  • EP2948930B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2948930B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2948930B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of producing an authenticatable article. An overt feature is produced in the article using a fabricating technique which is selected based on a material of the article so as to produce the overt feature having predetermined, reproducible macroscopic characteristics as well as random, non-reproducible microscopic characteristics rendering the article physically unique. The overt feature including the microscopic characteristics are imageable using a predetermined imaging technology to produce an overt feature image. An authentication signature is generated based on the overt feature image and stored in a central database. The overt feature may alternatively be produced in an apparatus or means used to manufacture authenticatable articles such that the overt feature including the random, microscopic characteristics is reproduced in the articles. The overt feature and generated authentication code therefore corresponds to articles manufactured using that apparatus or means.