Coke Plant Automation via Integrated Control Schemes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in the coke production process is to optimize coking rate, product recovery, and unit lime consumption in coke plants, particularly in horizontal heat recovery coke plants, where the integration of control systems is needed to manage variables such as temperature profiles, air flow, and coal density effectively, while minimizing the use of expensive equipment and improving coke quality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of integrated control schemes for coke ovens, including single loop control, multivariable control, and Model Predictive Control (MPC), which manipulate variables like oven uptakes, sole flue dampers, and door hole dampers to maintain optimal temperature and draft conditions, and utilize feedforward control to counteract disturbances, thereby optimizing coking rate, energy efficiency, and product yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If integrated control systems are implemented to optimize coking rate and product recovery, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoking rateVSAvoidcontrol system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into separate functional modules: a coking rate optimization module that controls oven temperature and air flow, a product recovery module that manages byproduct collection, and a lime consumption module that controls chemical additives. Each module operates independently but integrates with others through standardized communication protocols, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated control system performs multiple functions through a single platform: it optimizes coking rate, manages product recovery, controls lime consumption, and monitors equipment status. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate control systems for each function, improving productivity without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If advanced control and optimization techniques are used to improve coke quality, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke qualityVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors coke quality parameters such as strength, porosity, and composition, and uses this feedback to automatically adjust control variables including oven temperature profiles, air flow rates, and lime addition timing. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves manufacturing precision while keeping the control logic simple and rule-based.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system optimizes coke quality by dynamically adjusting operational parameters such as temperature setpoints, heating rates, and atmospheric composition. These parameter changes are made through simple lookup tables and empirical models rather than complex calculations, improving manufacturing precision without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple control loops are implemented to maintain optimal temperature and draft conditions, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidcontrol loops
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple control loops for temperature and draft management are merged into a single integrated control algorithm that simultaneously adjusts all variables based on their interactions. This unified approach maintains reliable temperature control while reducing the number of separate control loops and simplifying the overall control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses dynamic adjustment of control parameters based on real-time operating conditions. Instead of fixed control loops, the system adapts control gains and setpoints dynamically, improving reliability under varying conditions while keeping the control logic simple and responsive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances coking rate, improves coke quality, and reduces unit lime consumption by maintaining precise control over temperature and draft conditions, leading to increased throughput and better product recovery, while minimizing the need for expensive equipment and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

manipulate variables like oven uptakes, sole flue dampers, and door hole dampers to maintain optimal temperature and draft conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDraft control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

maintain optimal temperature and draft conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

maintain precise control over temperature and draft conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature control: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11788012B2Integrated coke plant automation and optimization using advanced control and optimization techniques
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 SUNCOKE TECH & DEV LLC
  • US11788012B2 patent drawing
  • US11788012B2 patent drawing
  • US11788012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology is generally directed to integrated control of coke ovens in a coke plant in order to optimize coking rate, product recovery, byproducts and/or unit lime consumption Optimization objectives are achieved through controlling certain variables (called control variables) by manipulating available handles (called manipulated variables) subject to constraints and system disturbances that affect the controlled variables.