Cold-Headed Copper-Aluminum Battery Pole for Low-Cost Top Covers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery top cover structures have high production costs due to low material utilization rates and complex processes, particularly with the use of copper-aluminum composite poles which are heavy and costly to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A pole and top cover structure design featuring a copper-aluminum composite pole made through a cold heading process, with a sealing flange portion and connecting step formed by cold heading, achieving a high material utilization rate of 100% and simplifying the manufacturing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If copper-aluminum friction welding or copper-aluminum composite plate stamping is used to form copper-aluminum composite poles, then the weight of the top cover is reduced, but the material utilization rate is low and the process is complex, resulting in high cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of top coverVSAvoidcomplexity of forming process
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pole is divided into two separate metal pillars (first metal pillar and second metal pillar) connected together, rather than using a complex copper-aluminum composite plate structure. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing process while maintaining the weight reduction benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connecting step and sealing flange portion are merged into an integrated structure formed by cold heading process, eliminating the need for separate forming operations and reducing process complexity while achieving both connection and sealing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If stamping process is used to manufacture poles, then the production efficiency is maintained, but the material utilization rate is only about 55% and the cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial utilization rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is changed from stamping to cold heading process. This parameter change in the forming method enables 100% material utilization rate while maintaining high production efficiency, as cold heading is a near-net-shape forming process with minimal material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If copper-aluminum composite plate stamping is used, then the material utilization rate improves, but the process becomes complex and the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial utilization rateVSAvoidease of manufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The process parameter is changed from composite plate stamping to cold heading of separate metal pillars. This simplifies the manufacturing process while achieving 100% material utilization rate, as cold heading is a simpler, more direct forming process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using composite plate materials requiring complex stamping, the invention uses two separate metal pillars (copper and aluminum) connected together. This approach achieves the desired material properties with a simpler manufacturing process and higher material utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces production costs by improving material utilization and simplifying the manufacturing process, while also enhancing sealing and insulation performance between the pole and the cover assembly.

Implementation Method 1

The protruding portion is embedded in the recessed portion to form a joint surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

A pole and top cover structure design featuring a copper-aluminum composite pole made through a cold heading process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCold heading: Cold-forming

Implementation Method 3

enhancing sealing and insulation performance between the pole and the cover assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 4

some negative poles use copper-aluminum composite poles to reduce the proportion of copper in the negative poles. Although this reduces the overall weight of the top cover

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite material density reduction: Composite Materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250158180A1Pole, top cover structure, battery, battery module and battery pack
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 EVE POWER CO LTD
  • US20250158180A1 patent drawing
  • US20250158180A1 patent drawing
  • US20250158180A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pole (4), a top cover structure (100), a battery (1000), a battery module and a battery pack are provided. The pole includes a first metal pillar (41) and a second metal pillar (42) connected to each other. One end of the first metal pillar (41) is provided with a heading groove (411), and the other end of the first metal pillar (41) opposite to the first end is provided with a protruding portion (412). The second metal pillar (42) is provided with a recessed portion (421) recessed in a direction away from the heading groove (411). The protruding portion (412) is embedded in the recessed portion (421) to form a joint surface (43).