Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet Composition for LME-Resistant Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high strength and high formability steel sheets for automotive parts face challenges in achieving simultaneous high tensile strength, hole expansion ratio, and liquid metal embrittlement resistance, with existing solutions either compromising on formability or weldability.

Innovation Solution

A cold rolled and heat-treated steel sheet with specific chemical composition and microstructure, including carbon, manganese, silicon, and molybdenum, and a ferrite-enriched surface layer, achieving ultimate tensile strength greater than 1170 MPa, hole expansion ratio above 30%, and adequate liquid metal embrittlement resistance, while maintaining formability and weldability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of steel sheets is increased to reduce vehicle weight and improve fuel efficiency, then tensile strength is improved, but formability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The steel sheet has a non-uniform microstructure with different phases distributed throughout: martensite (30-70%) provides high strength, bainite (10-40%) provides ductility, and retained austenite (5-20%) provides formability through TRIP effect. This local variation in phase composition allows simultaneous achievement of high tensile strength (>1100 MPa) and good formability (hole expansion ratio >30%).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The steel sheet employs a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (martensite, bainite, and retained austenite) within a single steel matrix. This multi-phase composite structure combines the high strength of martensite with the ductility and formability of bainite and austenite, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If high strength steel sheets are used to reduce material amount, then vehicle weight is reduced, but weldability deteriorates due to liquid metal embrittlement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidliquid metal embrittlement resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The steel composition is precisely controlled within specific ranges: carbon (0.17-0.25%), manganese (2.0-3.0%), silicon (0.9-2.0%), and small amounts of alloying elements (Ti: 0.001-0.05%, Nb: 0.001-0.05%, V: 0.001-0.1%, B: 0.0005-0.005%). These parameter adjustments optimize the microstructure to achieve high strength while maintaining weldability by preventing liquid metal embrittlement through controlled carbide formation and grain boundary characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If carbon content is increased to stabilize austenite and increase strength, then tensile strength is improved, but weldability deteriorates due to hardening of weld zone and heat-affected zone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidweldability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Carbon content is precisely controlled within 0.17-0.25%, which is sufficient to stabilize austenite and achieve high strength through martensitic transformation, but not excessive to cause severe hardening in the weld zone and heat-affected zone. This optimized carbon level, combined with other alloying elements, maintains the balance between strength and weldability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The steel sheet exhibits enhanced mechanical properties, improved formability, and resistance to liquid metal embrittlement, making it suitable for automotive applications while being compatible with conventional industrial manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

a microstructure comprising 30% to 70% of martensite, 10% to 40% of bainite and 5% to 20% of retained austenite by area fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

cold rolled and heat-treated steel sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

an adequate liquid metal embrittlement resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid metal embrittlement resistance:

Data Source

PatentUS20230243007A1Cold rolled and heat-treated steel sheet and method of manufacturing thereof
Publication Date: 2023.08.03 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • US20230243007A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cold rolled and heat-treated steel sheet, the steel including, in weight percentage, 0.17%≤carbon≤0.25%, 2%≤manganese≤3%, 0.9%≤silicon≤2%, 0%≤aluminum≤0.09%, 0.01%≤molybdenum≤0.2%, 0%≤phosphorus≤0.02%, 0%≤sulfur≤0.03%, 0%≤nitrogen≤0.09%, and optionally one or more of the following elements 0%≤chromium≤0.3%, 0%≤niobium≤0.06%, 0%≤titanium≤0.06%, 0%≤vanadium≤0.1%, 0%≤calcium≤0.005%, 0%≤boron≤0.010%, 0%≤Magnesium≤0.05%, 0%≤Zirconium≤0.05%, 0%≤Cerium≤0.1%, and the balance including iron and unavoidable impurities, the steel sheet having a microstructure of—50% to 80% of Bainite, 10% to 30% of residual austenite, 15% to 50% of Partitioned martensite, 0% to 10% of ferrite and 0% to 5% fresh martensite in area fractions, and a ferrite-enriched layer extending up to 50 microns from both surfaces of the steel sheet, such ferrite-enriched layer having a mean ferrite content from 55% to 80% in area fraction.