Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet Strength and Formability Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques fail to simultaneously achieve high-strength and both uniform and local deformability in high-strength steel sheets, as improving one property often compromises the others due to limitations in microstructure control and added elements like Nb or Ti increasing anisotropy.

Innovation Solution

Control of chemical composition, metallographic structure, and texture by adjusting pole densities and Lankford-values, along with dispersion of hard phases like martensite, to balance strength and deformability, while minimizing anisotropy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of steel sheet is increased, then the strength is improved, but the formability (deformability) is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters (C: 0.15-0.40%, Si: 0.01-2.50%, Mn: 1.50-3.50%, Al: 0.01-2.00%, P: 0.005-0.15%, S: 0.005-0.050%, N: 0.005-0.020%, Ti: 0.001-0.100%, Nb: 0.001-0.100%, V: 0.001-0.100%, B: 0.0005-0.0100%) and processing parameters (hot-rolling temperature range, cooling rate, pickling time, cold-rolling reduction ratio) to achieve a dual-phase microstructure that simultaneously provides high strength and good formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of ferrite and martensite phases, where the ferrite matrix provides ductility and the dispersed martensite particles provide strength. This composite structure at the microstructural level resolves the contradiction between strength and formability by combining the advantages of both phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If elements like Nb or Ti are added to increase strength, then the strength is improved, but the anisotropy is increased which worsens uniform deformability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidanisotropy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the parameter ranges of alloying elements (Ti: 0.001-0.100%, Nb: 0.001-0.100%, V: 0.001-0.100%, B: 0.0005-0.0100%) to achieve precipitation strengthening while controlling grain growth and minimizing anisotropy. The specific parameter combinations are designed to balance strength enhancement with microstructural uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by controlling the distribution and morphology of precipitates formed by Ti, Nb, and V additions. The precipitates are distributed uniformly throughout the ferrite matrix rather than concentrating in specific regions, which maintains isotropic properties while providing localized strengthening effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If microstructure is controlled to single phase to improve local ductility, then the local deformability is improved, but the strength is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal ductilityVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a dual-phase composite microstructure consisting of a ferrite matrix with dispersed martensite particles. The ferrite phase provides excellent local ductility and deformability, while the hard martensite particles dispersed throughout the matrix provide high strength through precipitation strengthening and obstacle effects on dislocation motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by creating regions of different microstructural characteristics: the ferrite matrix provides a soft, ductile background for good formability, while locally dispersed martensite particles provide hard, strong reinforcement. This spatial differentiation of microstructural properties allows simultaneous achievement of high strength and good local ductility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a cold-rolled steel sheet with high-strength, excellent uniform and local deformability, and reduced anisotropy, even when elements like Nb or Ti are added, effectively meeting the requirements of tensile strength, elongation, hole expansion ratio, and bendability.

Implementation Method 1

a first hot-rolling process in which a steel is hot-rolled under conditions such that an average grain size of an austenite in the steel is controlled to 200 μm or less; a second hot-rolling process in which the steel is hot-rolled under conditions such that a cumulative reduction is 50% or more in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS10266928B2Method for producing a cold-rolled steel sheet
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

AI summary

A cold-rolled steel sheet satisfies that an average pole density of an orientation group of {100}<011> to {223}<110> is 1.0 to 5.0, a pole density of a crystal orientation {332}<113> is 1.0 to 4.0, a Lankford-value rC in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.50, and a Lankford-value r30 in a direction making an angle of 30° with the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.50. Moreover, the cold-rolled steel sheet includes, as a metallographic structure, by area %, a ferrite and a bainite of 30% to 99% in total and a martensite of 1% to 70%.