Collaboration System Risk Assessment via Shared Link Event Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collaboration systems lack effective techniques for calculating and reporting risks associated with cross-enterprise document sharing, particularly when anonymous users are involved, leading to increased vulnerability and data loss risks.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of techniques that capture and analyze events on shared objects to distill sharing events into an interactive threat assessment tool, enabling administrators to monitor and report collaboration system risks effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cross-enterprise document sharing is enabled with anonymous users, then accessibility and collaboration versatility are improved, but security vulnerability and data loss risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration versatilityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors access events to shared documents and provides feedback to administrators through risk calculations and reports. This feedback mechanism enables real-time detection of suspicious activities and informed decision-making regarding document access permissions, thereby maintaining security while preserving collaboration versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary risk assessment system is introduced between the document sharing mechanism and the security monitoring layer. This intermediary component analyzes access patterns, calculates risks, and provides recommendations, effectively mediating between the need for broad access and security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive monitoring of anonymous user actions is implemented, then risk detection capability is improved, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses monitoring on specific risk indicators rather than analyzing all document access events uniformly. By identifying and prioritizing critical risk factors (such as unusual access patterns, unauthorized modifications, or access from unknown locations), the system achieves effective risk detection without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters based on the document type, user profile, and access context. Rather than applying a fixed complex monitoring approach, the system adapts its analysis depth and parameters to the specific situation, reducing unnecessary processing complexity while maintaining high risk detection capability where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of sharing events is performed, then threat assessment accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The threat assessment process is segmented into multiple stages: initial risk filtering, detailed analysis of suspicious events, and final threat assessment. This segmentation allows the system to perform quick preliminary assessments on most events and reserve detailed analysis only for potentially threatening activities, thereby improving accuracy for critical cases without unnecessarily increasing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial analysis to the majority of routine access events, performing only the necessary minimal checks. Detailed thorough analysis is applied selectively only to events that trigger risk thresholds or show anomalous patterns. This partial action approach maintains sufficient threat assessment accuracy for most scenarios while significantly reducing total computational resource consumption and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250156563A1Calculating and reporting collaboration system risks
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 BOX INC
  • US20250156563A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156563A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156563A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer program products for a content management system. Embodiments operate within or in conjunction with such a content management system. The content management system stores content objects for access by various collaborators, including extra-system collaborators. A user of the content management system configures extra-enterprise shared link URLs that permit the extra-system collaborators to access shared content objects over an Internet connection. A shared link event graph data structure is formed based on access requests over the extra-enterprise shared link URLs. An interactive user interface module is generated by processing a shared link report query over the shared link event graph data structure to select a subject set of the extra-enterprise shared link URLs, and to generate a data set of the interactive user interface module based at least in part on results from the query. A user interacts with the interactive user interface module to generate insights.