Collaboration Score Generation for Entity Pairing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated evaluation and scoring of collaboration between multiple entities is inaccurate due to numerous variables and ineffective pairing methods, failing to accurately match entities based on their needs.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based apparatus and method that receives entity profiles, generates opportunity data by classifying entity data into categories, determines attribute scores, plots graphical data for comparison, and calculates a collaboration score to assess compatibility and draft a collaboration report for display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automated evaluation methods are used to score collaboration between entities, then the process becomes automated and scalable, but the accuracy and precision of pairing entities based on their needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of collaboration evaluationVSAvoidaccuracy of entity pairing
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the collaboration evaluation process into distinct modules: entity profile reception, opportunity data generation through classification, attribute score determination, graphical data plotting, and collaboration score calculation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, maintaining automation while improving precision through specialized processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including opportunity data as a mediator between entity profiles and collaboration scores, and graphical data as a visual intermediary for comparison. These intermediaries transform raw entity data into meaningful collaboration assessments, enabling accurate pairing while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If simple pairing methods are used, then the process remains simple and fast, but the accuracy of matching entities based on their needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of pairing processVSAvoidaccuracy of entity matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by classifying entity data into opportunity categories before determining attribute scores and generating collaboration scores. This pre-processing organizes the data structure in advance, enabling fast yet accurate matching through structured comparison of pre-classified attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms entity data into multiple parameter representations including opportunity categories, attribute scores, and graphical data representations. These parameter transformations enable both rapid processing through numerical comparisons and accurate matching through multi-dimensional analysis of entity characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple variables are considered in entity evaluation, then the accuracy of collaboration scoring improves, but the complexity of the evaluation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of collaboration scoringVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex evaluation process into discrete, manageable steps: receiving entity profiles, classifying data into opportunity categories, determining attribute scores, plotting graphical data, and calculating collaboration scores. This segmentation makes the complex multi-variable evaluation process systematic and easier to implement while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation mechanisms with automated computational processes that systematically process multiple variables. The machine learning-based classification and scoring systems automatically handle the complexity of evaluating multiple entity attributes, reducing the burden on human operators while maintaining comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12086530B1Apparatus and a method for the generation of a collaboration score
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 THE STRATEGIC COACH
  • US12086530B1 patent drawing
  • US12086530B1 patent drawing
  • US12086530B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for the generation of a collaboration score is disclosed. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. The memory instructs the processor to receive a plurality of entity profiles from a plurality of entities, wherein each of the plurality of entity profiles includes entity data. The memory instructs the processor to identify a plurality of opportunity data as a function of the plurality of entity profiles. The memory instructs the processor to generate collaboration data as a function of the plurality of opportunity data. The memory instructs the processor to determine a collaboration score as a function of the collaboration data. The memory instructs the processor to draft a collaboration report as a function of the collaboration score and the collaboration data. The memory instructs the processor to display the collaboration report using a display device.