Collaborative Bargaining System for Bulk Purchase Negotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current e-commerce platforms lack an efficient mechanism for buyers and sellers to collaborate on bulk purchases, leading to increased risks for sellers and potentially higher prices for buyers, as they often rely on traditional listing and bidding methods without incentivizing quantity-based discounts.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative bargaining system that allows buyers to express interest in items, forming groups to negotiate prices with sellers, who compete to offer the lowest price per item based on a minimum quantity, with a time-limited exclusive opportunity for the winning seller to secure commitments from the interest group.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional listing and bidding methods are used, then sellers can advertise goods to geographically dispersed audiences, but sellers face increased risks and buyers pay potentially higher prices without quantity-based discounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseller riskVSAvoidsales volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by forming interest groups and receiving expressions of interest before the bidding process begins. This allows sellers to assess potential sales volume and reduce risk by knowing there is sufficient buyer interest before committing to sell, thereby resolving the contradiction between seller risk reduction and sales volume requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If sellers compete to offer lowest prices, then buyers benefit from lower prices, but sellers face reduced profit margins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales volumeVSAvoidseller profit
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the pricing parameter from fixed per-unit pricing to quantity-based tiered pricing. Sellers can offer different price levels corresponding to different quantity thresholds, allowing them to maintain higher profit margins on smaller sales while still competing for large-volume purchases. This resolves the contradiction by enabling sellers to adjust pricing parameters based on expected sales volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If buyers form interest groups to negotiate bulk purchases, then buyers can achieve lower prices, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchase quantityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary platform that manages the complex processes of interest group formation, bid evaluation, and commitment coordination. This intermediary handles the computational and organizational complexity, allowing buyers to benefit from bulk purchasing power without directly managing the system complexity themselves. The platform automates matching buyers and sellers based on quantity requirements and bid prices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8775267B2Collaborative bargaining
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 BRIDGEWELL
  • US8775267B2 patent drawing
  • US8775267B2 patent drawing
  • US8775267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collaborative bargaining system receives expressions of interest from potential buyers of an item. The collaborative bargaining system receives bids from sellers of the item. Each bid consists of a price per item based on a minimum quantity of items. A time limited exclusive opportunity is awarded to one seller of the item to obtain from the interest group a commitment to buy the minimum quantity of items at the price per item as bid by the one seller. Sales of the item are closed when the interest group commits to buy the minimum quantity of items.