Collaborative Data Synchronization Across Near- and Far-Field Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data transmission methods in electronic devices do not efficiently address user experience issues related to data transmission efficiency and manner, particularly in collaborative synchronization scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A data transmission method that determines the data transmission manner based on the quantity of electronic devices and network status, using device-to-device communication for near field networks and cloud-based communication for far field networks to optimize synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If cloud-based communication is used for far field networks, then data transmission coverage is extended, but synchronization delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission coverageVSAvoidsynchronization delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses cloud servers as intermediaries for far-field communication, enabling data transmission across wide areas while managing synchronization through centralized coordination. The cloud server acts as a mediator that receives data from one device and distributes it to other devices, extending coverage while maintaining manageable synchronization delays through server-controlled timing and routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between direct device-to-device communication for near-field scenarios and cloud-mediated communication for far-field scenarios. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize for low delay when devices are close while extending coverage when devices are distant, resolving the contradiction between coverage area and synchronization delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If device-to-device communication is used for near field networks, then synchronization delay is reduced, but data transmission coverage is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization delayVSAvoiddata transmission coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects communication paths based on device proximity and network conditions. For near-field devices, it uses direct peer-to-peer communication to minimize delay. For far-field devices, it transitions to cloud-mediated communication to extend coverage. This dynamic routing strategy resolves the contradiction by adapting the communication mode to the specific spatial context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If continuous synchronization is performed in collaborative scenarios, then data consistency is maintained, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic synchronization intervals rather than continuous synchronization. Devices synchronize data at predetermined time intervals or when specific change thresholds are met, maintaining data consistency while avoiding the excessive power consumption of continuous real-time synchronization. This periodic approach balances reliability requirements with energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Productivity

If traditional data transmission methods are used, then system complexity is low, but data transmission efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts transmission protocols and paths based on network conditions, device proximity, and data priority. This dynamic behavior improves transmission efficiency by selecting optimal routes and formats, but increases system complexity through the need for condition assessment and adaptive decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments data transmission into different channels and priorities, with different protocols for near-field and far-field communication, and different synchronization intervals for different data types. This segmentation improves overall efficiency by optimizing each segment for its specific requirements, but increases system complexity through the need to manage multiple transmission modes and protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260099292A1Data transmission method, electronic device, and system
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20260099292A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099292A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099292A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data transmission method, including receiving, by a first electronic device, at least one piece of second synchronization information in response to starting a collaborative application, where the second synchronization information is for, and in a one-to-one correspondence with, at least one second electronic device, determining, based on the second synchronization information, whether the first electronic device is collaboratively synchronized with the at least one second electronic device, determining, in response to the first electronic device being collaboratively synchronized with the at least one second electronic device, a first data transmission manner based on a quantity of second electronic devices or a network status between the first electronic device and the second electronic device. transmitting to-be-synchronized data to the at least one second electronic device in the first data transmission manner.