Collaborative Image Selection System with Community Rating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in finding and selecting interesting digital images from large collections, and in sharing and assembling image compilations due to the overwhelming number of images available, which increases the time and effort required for review and curation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for sharing and collaborating on image selection, where users can access, rate, recommend, and compile images within communities, using metrics to rank images based on user interest, allowing for automatic selection and presentation of images for electronic or physical compilations like photo books.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If images are made freely accessible to all users, then image sharing and collaboration are improved, but the time and effort required to review and find interesting images increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage sharing capabilityVSAvoidtime to review images
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a rating system and recommendation engine as intermediaries between the large image collection and users. Community members rate images, and these ratings serve as a mediator to guide users to interesting images without requiring them to review all available images manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user ratings and recommendations are processed to generate personalized image recommendations. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from community interactions and improve image selection over time, reducing the time users spend searching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of images are made available for selection, then the quality and variety of compilations can be improved, but the complexity of selecting and arranging images increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompilation qualityVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables images to serve themselves through automated rating and recommendation systems. Instead of requiring manual curation of all images, the system allows images to be evaluated and recommended based on community ratings and algorithmic processing, reducing the complexity of the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of reviewing and selecting images is replaced with an automated electronic system that processes ratings, calculates recommendations, and generates compilation suggestions algorithmically, significantly reducing the complexity burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual review of all images is performed to ensure quality, then selection accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage selection accuracyVSAvoidimage curation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring complete manual review of all images, the system applies partial action by using automated rating systems and recommendation algorithms to pre-filter and prioritize images. This allows the system to achieve sufficient selection accuracy without the exhaustive manual review that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7321919B2System and method for collaborative image selection
Publication Date: 2008.01.22 GULA CONSULTING LLC
  • US7321919B2 patent drawing
  • US7321919B2 patent drawing
  • US7321919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for sharing images and collaborating in the selection of images likely to be interest to a user. Images (e.g., photos) are shared within a community of users, by allowing user to access any unrestricted community image, recommend an image to another user, assemble compilations of any images the user can access, etc. Various metrics regarding user activity are tracked, such as how often an image was viewed, downloaded, recommended, included in a compilation, printed, edited, etc. The metric values may be normalized, and then weighted and combined to produce, for each image, a ranking or rating personalized to an individual user. Ratings of images for a user may be used to order them for electronic presentation, assemble a set of images for an electronic compilation (e.g., an online album) or physical compilation (e.g., a photo book, a yearbook) or for some other purpose.