Collaborative Neural Architecture Search Using Variational Autoencoders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural architecture search techniques are time-consuming and computationally intensive, requiring significant resources and central coordination for evaluating different neural architectures, and lack efficient methods for partitioning the search space and determining optimal architectures.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative neural architecture search method using variational autoencoders to embed neural architectures in a vector space, allowing for distributed training and validation across multiple nodes, with data sharing and gradient-based optimization to improve performance, and leveraging a distributed ledger for minimal communication and probabilistic verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional neural architecture search evaluates different architectures sequentially, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but search time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the search space into multiple partitions and assigns different partitions to different worker nodes for parallel evaluation. The master node coordinates the search process by managing worker nodes and aggregating results, enabling simultaneous evaluation of multiple architectures without compromising accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of the evaluation pipeline across distributed worker nodes. Each worker node independently evaluates architectures in its assigned partition using the same evaluation criteria, allowing parallel processing while maintaining consistent evaluation standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If more computational resources are allocated to evaluate architectures thoroughly, then performance prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the computational workload by dividing the search space into partitions and assigning them to different worker nodes. This distributes the computational burden while maintaining thorough evaluation through gradient-based optimization at each node

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The master node acts as an intermediary that coordinates between the search space definition and worker nodes. It manages the distribution of evaluation tasks and aggregation of results, simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling complex distributed computations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If distributed nodes evaluate architectures independently without coordination, then processing speed is improved, but data consistency and search efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Worker nodes continuously report evaluation results and gradient information back to the master node, which coordinates updates to the embedding positions. This feedback mechanism ensures that distributed evaluations remain consistent with the overall search objective while maintaining high processing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous coordination between the master node and worker nodes through iterative gradient updates and embedding position adjustments. This ensures that the distributed evaluation process remains aligned with the search objective throughout the optimization process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250021813A1Apparatus and method for collaborative neural architecture search
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 SIT CHUN YAN ENOCH
  • US20250021813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This application embodiment relates to the field of neural architecture search technology, particularly to an apparatus and method for collaborative neural network search. The apparatus includes a first node for providing a preset search space and dataset, a second node for generating a variational autoencoder and partitioning the search space; at least two cooperating third nodes, the third node is used to determine the performance of multiple candidate neural architectures, train a performance predictor, and update the embedding position based on the gradient direction provided by the performance trainer, wherein data information is shared between different third nodes. By using the variational autoencoder, the third node can hypothesize that similar unit structures/neural architectures have similar performance on the same dataset when conducting the search, collaboratively searching for the best neural architecture (by broadcasting the evaluation results of its neural architecture) and achieving effective evaluation of different neural architectures.