Collaborative Prompt Publishing With Automated Feedback Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional generative language models require significant human intervention for output review, editing, and training, especially for generating long-form documents at scale, and struggle with inconsistent outputs and limited input parameters, making them resource-intensive and inefficient for large-scale content generation.

Innovation Solution

A generative collaborative publishing system that includes a prompt generation subsystem, content generation subsystem, pre-publication feedback subsystem, and post-publication feedback subsystem to automate and refine the content generation process, minimizing human intervention and improving output quality through iterative feedback loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional generative language models are used for content generation, then automated content creation can be achieved, but significant human intervention is required for review and editing due to limitations in input length, quality control, and consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated content creationVSAvoidcontent quality and consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content generation process into distinct phases: prompt generation, content generation, pre-publication feedback, and post-publication feedback. Each phase is handled by specialized subsystems that work together to produce high-quality content while maintaining automation. The prompt generation subsystem creates structured prompts, the content generation subsystem produces content, and feedback subsystems ensure quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where pre-publication feedback subsystems evaluate generated content before publication and post-publication feedback subsystems assess published content. This feedback mechanism enables automated quality control and consistency checking, reducing the need for human intervention while maintaining high standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If human review and editing are performed on generated content, then content quality can be maintained, but the process becomes inefficient for large-scale automated content creation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidcontent creation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service quality control through automated feedback mechanisms. The pre-publication feedback subsystem automatically evaluates generated content against quality criteria, and the post-publication feedback subsystem continuously monitors published content. This self-service approach maintains content quality without requiring manual human review at every stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment through the pre-publication feedback subsystem before content is published. This preliminary action identifies and corrects quality issues early in the process, preventing defective content from reaching publication and eliminating the need for post-publication human editing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Length of moving object

If longer input lengths are provided to generative models, then more comprehensive content can be generated, but model performance and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput lengthVSAvoidmodel output consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments long input requirements into manageable prompt components created by the prompt generation subsystem. Instead of providing excessively long single prompts, the system breaks down complex content requirements into structured, modular prompts that maintain model performance while achieving comprehensive content generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes prompt parameters and structure to achieve better performance with appropriate input lengths. The prompt generation subsystem carefully controls prompt length, complexity, and formatting parameters to maximize model output consistency while providing sufficient information for comprehensive content generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12632669B2Generative collaborative publishing system
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12632669B2 patent drawing
  • US12632669B2 patent drawing
  • US12632669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the disclosed technologies include creating a first set of title prompts by applying a first set of title prompt templates to a seed, where the seed includes a topic descriptor, applying a first generative language model to the first set of title prompts, outputting, by the first generative language model, based on the first set of title prompts, a first set of document titles, creating a first set of document prompts by applying a first set of document prompt templates different from the first set of title prompt templates to the first set of document titles, applying a second generative language model to the first set of document prompts, and outputting, by the second generative language model, based on the first set of document prompts, a first set of documents.