Collaborative Robot Force-Pattern Restart to Prevent Accidental Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human-collaborative robots are prone to accidental operation when a simple action pattern is misinterpreted as a command, potentially leading to unsafe restarts and reduced productivity due to the need for precise sensor configurations and costly placement of restart buttons.

Innovation Solution

A human-collaborative robot equipped with a sensor section to specify the portion of the robot receiving external force, a judging section to verify the pattern of force application, and a commanding section to execute predetermined motions only when the force is applied to a specified portion in a predetermined pattern, using sensors like six-axes force sensors, contact sensors, or torque sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a simple action pattern is used to restart the robot, then productivity is improved, but the robot may be accidentally operated when the pattern is misinterpreted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot restart efficiencyVSAvoidaccidental operation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot body is divided into multiple detection zones with different sensitivity levels. The force sensor is configured to detect external forces applied to different portions of the robot arm, allowing the system to distinguish between intentional restart commands (applied to specific safe zones) and accidental contacts (applied to other zones). This spatial segmentation enables simple restart patterns while preventing accidental operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If the restart button is positioned near the robot, then restart speed is improved, but the cost increases due to separate button arrangement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestart timeVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The restart function is merged with the force detection capability of the robot arm. Instead of adding a separate restart button, the system uses the existing force sensor to detect intentional external forces as restart commands. This combines the sensing and control functions, eliminating the need for separate restart hardware while reducing restart time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Area of stationary object

If contact sensors are configured to detect contact with the entirety of the robot arm, then detection coverage is improved, but the robot may be restarted when force is applied to non-specified portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor detection coverageVSAvoidcommand accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the robot arm are assigned different functional qualities. Specific portions are designated as valid restart zones where applied force will trigger restart, while other portions are designated as invalid zones where force application will not trigger restart. This local differentiation allows comprehensive detection coverage while ensuring command accuracy by only responding to forces applied to authorized zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces the likelihood of accidental robot operation by ensuring that only intended actions, such as knocking specific parts of the robot, are recognized as commands, enhancing safety and productivity by allowing simple and precise restarts without costly button placement.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor section configured to, when an external force is applied to the robot, specify a portion of the robot to which the external force is applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensor detection: Force

Implementation Method 2

a judging section configured to judge as to whether or not the external force is applied to the robot based on a predetermined pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce pattern recognition: Force

Implementation Method 3

a commanding section configured to, when the external force is applied to the robot based on the predetermined pattern and when the portion to which the external force is applied corresponds to the specified portion, command the robot so that the robot performs a motion which is previously associated with the pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCommand execution:

Data Source

PatentUS10899018B2Human-collaborative robot
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 FANUC LTD
  • US10899018B2 patent drawing
  • US10899018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A human-collaborative robot, by which the robot is unlikely to be accidentally operated despite the intention of the human, even if a relatively simple action pattern is determined as a command to the robot. When an external force by a human is applied to the robot, the force is detected by a force sensor. The robot is configured to be stopped when the detected external force exceeds a predetermined threshold. In order to restart the stopped motion of the robot, the human purposely applies the external force to the robot. When a judging section judges that the external force is applied to a specified portion the robot based on a predetermined action pattern, a commanding section commands the robot so that the robot performs a motion which is previously associated with the pattern.