Collaborative Search Result Filtering Through Unwanted-Result Exclusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing search engines often provide large sets of search results, making it difficult for users to efficiently identify and access relevant information due to the time-consuming process of reviewing numerous irrelevant or unwanted results, which can lead to missing important information.

Innovation Solution

A search tool that allows users to indicate unwanted results, either actively or passively, enabling the system to remove these results and modify the search algorithm to exclude similar results, thereby refining the search output to prioritize relevant information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search engines provide comprehensive search results, then the quantity of information available increases, but the time required for users to review and identify relevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of search resultsVSAvoidtime to review search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by having users indicate unwanted results before the final search results are fully processed. The system then uses these indications to pre-filter and modify subsequent search results, saving users time in the future search iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user indications of unwanted search results are captured and used to modify the search algorithm. This feedback loop continuously refines search results by learning from user preferences and eliminating unwanted content types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If search engines provide extensive search results, then the completeness of information increases, but the difficulty of identifying relevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of search resultsVSAvoiddifficulty of identifying relevant information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes unwanted results from the search output based on user indications. By taking out irrelevant or unwanted content, the system maintains completeness of relevant information while reducing the difficulty of identifying what matters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring users to actively identify wanted results among many options, the system inverts the approach by having users indicate unwanted results and automatically removing them, thereby simplifying the identification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If users actively indicate unwanted results, then the precision of search results improves, but the complexity of user interaction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of search resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of user interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing users to simply indicate unwanted results without requiring complex interactions. The system then automatically processes these indications and refines search results, making the precision improvement accessible through simple user actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the search algorithm is modified to exclude similar results, then the relevance of search results improves, but the time required to process and modify the algorithm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of search resultsVSAvoidtime to modify search algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial modification to the search algorithm by focusing on excluding specific types of results based on user indications, rather than completely reprocessing the entire algorithm. This partial action achieves improved relevance with reduced processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12475181B2Systems and methods for facilitating enhancements to related electronic searches coordinated for a group of users
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 TWITTLE SEARCH LLC
  • US12475181B2 patent drawing
  • US12475181B2 patent drawing
  • US12475181B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with some embodiments, processes and interfaces provide for enhancing search results of a group research project. For example, members of a group may be provided with information regarding other group member's search activities and/or be restricted from viewing certain search results (e.g., search results that are most popular with the public for a given search term, that are most popular with the group for the given search term or for the project, and/or search results that are restricted by a group manager).