Collaborative Search System Using Tribal Knowledge for Result Relevance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current internet search engines lack trustworthiness in providing relevant results, as they do not effectively utilize 'tribal knowledge' or peer recommendations, leading to a disconnect between search engine results and user preferences.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative search system that processes user queries using tribal knowledge from like-minded individuals, incorporating browsing habits, session times, and reviews to prioritize search results based on relevance to the user's profiled interests, blending organic search results with collaborative listings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If search engines use traditional search algorithms to generate results, then search coverage and speed are improved, but trustworthiness and relevance to user preferences deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch speedVSAvoidtrustworthiness of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges traditional search engine results with collaborative filtering recommendations from like-minded individuals. The search results page displays both organic search results and collaborative search results, combining the speed of traditional search algorithms with the trustworthiness of peer recommendations. This hybrid approach allows the system to maintain fast search performance while incorporating social proof and tribal knowledge into the results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of collaborative filtering between the user's query and the final search results. Instead of directly providing search engine results, the system uses like-minded individuals as intermediaries to filter and rank results. The system identifies users with similar profiles and uses their browsing habits and preferences as a mediator to curate personalized results, thereby improving trustworthiness without sacrificing search speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If search engines provide generic search results, then search coverage is improved, but personalization and relevance to individual user interests deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch coverageVSAvoidrelevance to user interests
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing search results based on the individual user's profile and preferences rather than providing uniform results to all users. The system identifies like-minded individuals with similar profiles and uses their preferences to locally customize the search results for each user. This allows the system to maintain broad search coverage while delivering highly personalized results that match each user's specific interests and needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making search results adaptive to changing user preferences and profiles. The system continuously learns from user behavior patterns and updates the collaborative filtering models to reflect evolving interests. This dynamic approach allows the search system to maintain comprehensive coverage while continuously improving relevance to each user's current preferences, adapting to new interests and priorities over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system collects and processes tribal knowledge from users, then search result relevance is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by having users actively contribute their own browsing habits, preferences, and feedback to the collaborative filtering system. Users rate websites, indicate preferences, and provide feedback that automatically feeds into the tribal knowledge database. This self-service approach allows the system to improve result relevance through user-generated data without requiring complex centralized processing, as users themselves participate in curating the collaborative information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where users provide ratings and feedback on search results and websites. This feedback loops back into the collaborative filtering system to refine and improve future recommendations. The feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously learn from user preferences and adjust the tribal knowledge models, improving relevance without requiring overly complex processing systems. The feedback-driven approach enables iterative improvement through relatively simple data collection and analysis processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7904442B2Method and apparatus for facilitating a collaborative search procedure
Publication Date: 2011.03.08 INTUIT INC
  • US7904442B2 patent drawing
  • US7904442B2 patent drawing
  • US7904442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the present invention provides a system that facilitates intelligent query operations by using a collaborative search procedure which employs tribal knowledge from a group of like-minded individuals. During operation, the system receives a search query from the user. The system then processes the query using the tribal knowledge obtained from like-minded individuals to produce a results list for the user. For example, this tribal knowledge can include the browsing habits of the collection of users as represented by their selection of websites and the session times for these website views, as well as any reviews posted by these users for the websites they browse.