Collapsible Ballistic Barrier Structure for Uniform Fill Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collapsible ballistic protection modules suffer from uneven protection distribution, instability, complexity, and high cost, making them difficult to transport, stack, and secure to structures.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible ballistic protection module comprising a canvas structure with interlocking rods and fastening means that allows for uniform mass distribution, easy stacking, and secure attachment to adjacent structures, using local materials like gravel or sand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sandbags are used for ballistic protection, then local mass is readily available and easy to transport, but the protection is uneven (wide at bottom, narrow at top) and walls are unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of transportVSAvoidwall stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The ballistic protection module is divided into multiple collapsible cells formed from fabric panels that can be interconnected. Each cell can be independently filled and stacked, creating a modular system that maintains stability while being easy to transport and deploy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The module uses a three-dimensional box-like structure with vertical and horizontal reinforcement elements, transitioning from the traditional two-dimensional sandbag approach. This adds structural rigidity and stability in multiple directions while maintaining collapsibility for transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If sandbags are used for ballistic protection, then local mass is readily available, but a lot of bags must be filled and emptied to make up a large ballistic area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of fillingVSAvoidcoverage area efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple small fabric panels are merged to form a large interconnected cell structure that can be filled as a single unit or in large sections. This eliminates the need to individually fill numerous separate bags to achieve large coverage areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The module creates large three-dimensional protective structures in a single filling operation, rather than requiring many separate two-dimensional sandbags to be stacked and filled individually, significantly improving coverage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If collapsible ballistic protection modules are made larger for better coverage, then fewer modules are needed, but they become difficult to handle and transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage efficiencyVSAvoidease of handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The large protective structure is segmented into multiple interconnected fabric panels that can be collapsed flat for transport. When deployed, these panels form a large coverage area, but during transport they fold into compact, manageable sections that are easy to handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fabric structure transitions dynamically between a compact collapsed state for transport and a large expanded state for protection. This allows the module to provide large coverage when needed while remaining easy to transport when not in use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Strength

If specialized equipment is used for collapsible ballistic protection, then structural integrity is improved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmodule complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The module uses flexible fabric panels instead of rigid specialized structures. The fabric is reinforced with simple rod elements and connection points, providing structural integrity while maintaining simplicity and avoiding complex specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The module combines fabric material with simple rod reinforcements and connection elements to create a composite structure that achieves structural integrity through material combination rather than complex design, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Reliability

If more local mass is added to increase protection, then ballistic damping improves, but the module becomes heavier and harder to transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic protectionVSAvoidmodule weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ballistic protection function is extracted from the structure itself and achieved through separate local mass filling. The fabric structure provides the containment and shape, while the local mass (sand, gravel, water) provides the ballistic protection, allowing the structure to remain lightweight and portable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4328538B1Collapsible ballistic protection module
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 VARDALIFE AS
  • EP4328538B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4328538B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4328538B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A collapsible ballistic protection module (1; 1') for protection of structures and personnel, comprising a canvas structure (2; 2') comprising outer wall segments (8; 8'). The outer wall segments (8; 8') defining an inside (9; 9') configured for filling with local mass. The collapsible ballistic protection module (1; 1') comprises vertical rods (3; 3') configured for supporting the outer wall segments (8; 8'), and longitudinal rods (4,5; 4',5') and transversal rods (6,7; 6',7') configured for releasably interlocking with the vertical rods (3; 3') for supporting the canvas structure (2; 2').