Collapsible Modular Beam Structure With Dead Center Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collapsible, elongate structure modules face challenges when used in modular beam structures due to tensional, compressive, and torsional forces, particularly in applications where a lying beam structure is required, as existing solutions are not directly applicable.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible, elongate support structure module with a dead center mechanism at the hinge connection and a releasable locking device, allowing for adjustable angles between side elements and enabling secure engagement of adjacent edges, which forms a beam structure capable of changing direction and resisting loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If collapsible structure modules are used in modular beam structures, then the structure can be assembled and disassembled, but the module cannot adequately resist tensional, compressive, and torsional forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly and disassembly capabilityVSAvoidresistance to tensional, compressive, and torsional forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The side elements are divided into multiple parts connected by hinge connections, allowing the structure to be segmented for easy assembly and disassembly while maintaining structural integrity when locked

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge connections enable dynamic adjustment of side elements to different angles, allowing the module to adapt to various beam configurations while the locking device provides static stability when loaded

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Volume of moving object

If the side elements are made collapsible for easy storage and transport, then the module volume is reduced, but the structure becomes less stable under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule volume for storage and transportVSAvoidstructural stability under load
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The side elements can dynamically transition between collapsed and unfolded states through hinge connections, providing volume reduction for storage while maintaining stability when locked in the unfolded position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device automatically engages to stabilize the side elements when they are unfolded and loaded, providing self-stabilization without requiring additional support structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If a releasable locking device is added to interlock adjacent edges of side elements, then the structural stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidlocking device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is designed to automatically engage and lock adjacent edges of side elements when they are positioned correctly, providing self-stabilization without requiring complex control mechanisms or additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The module provides structural stability and torsion resistance, allowing for efficient assembly and disassembly without tools, and can form beams with adjustable angles, addressing the limitations of existing solutions in modular beam structures.

Implementation Method 1

a dead center mechanism at the hinge connection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDead center mechanism: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

a releasable locking device is provided at said one location or at least at one of said plurality of locations to interlock adjacent edges of said at least two adjacent side elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS9938720B2Support structure module and modular beam structure
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 IPI ACCESS
  • US9938720B2 patent drawing
  • US9938720B2 patent drawing
  • US9938720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular beam structure consisting of one or more collapsible, lockable and interconnectable support structure modules, and any transition module to change longitudinal direction of the structure. In addition, it is possible to attach onto one or more support structure modules a collapsible platform and/or wall or fence. The structure is at an upstream end or start end attachable, via a module end element, onto an attachment device, e.g. a wall or attachment block, via a support frame which is fixedly attached to the attachment device.