System and method for reducing foot contact with bedding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bedding standoff devices are unwieldy, not right-sized, difficult to erect and fold, and can pose hazards to sleepers, failing to effectively reduce contact between a sleeper's feet and bedding.

Innovation Solution

A bedding standoff system comprising rotatable legs, hinge components, and stabilizer feet, designed to be easily deployed, collapsed, and reconfigured to create a space between the bedding and the sleeper's feet, while minimizing volume when not in use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional bedding standoff devices are used, then feet are protected from bedding contact, but the devices become unwieldy and pose hazards to sleepers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot protectionVSAvoidsafety hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bedding standoff device is divided into multiple legs (typically three or four) that can be independently positioned. Each leg terminates in a stabilizing foot, allowing the structure to be segmented for better stability and safety. This segmentation enables the device to distribute weight and contact points, reducing the risk of tipping or causing injury while maintaining reliable foot protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bedding standoff device incorporates legs that are rotatable relative to the body, allowing dynamic adjustment of the structure. This rotational capability enables the device to be easily deployed and collapsed, and allows it to adapt to different bed configurations. The dynamic nature of the legs improves safety by allowing the device to be properly positioned without forcing awkward or hazardous configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If bedding standoff devices are designed for stability, then they provide reliable foot protection, but they become difficult to erect and fold

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot protectionVSAvoiddeployment difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The legs are designed to rotate relative to the body through hinge joints, creating a dynamic structure that can be easily deployed and collapsed. This rotational mechanism allows users to simply lift and position the legs without complex assembly steps, significantly improving ease of operation while maintaining structural stability when deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The bedding standoff device is designed to be self-supporting when deployed, with the legs naturally stabilizing in position through their geometric configuration and stabilizing feet. This self-service characteristic eliminates the need for complex locking mechanisms or additional components, allowing users to deploy and collapse the device easily without requiring technical knowledge or additional tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Volume of moving object

If bedding standoff devices are made compact, then they are easy to store, but they cannot provide adequate foot protection space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage volumeVSAvoidfoot protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bedding standoff device collapses into a compact configuration for storage, with all legs folding against the body to minimize volume. When deployed, the legs rotate outward to provide adequate spacing for foot protection. This dynamic transformation allows the device to transition between compact storage and functional deployment states, satisfying both space efficiency and protection requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The legs are designed to nest against the body when collapsed, with each leg fitting within the structure formed by the other legs. This nesting arrangement minimizes the storage volume of the device while maintaining all necessary components for effective foot protection when deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Ease of operation

If bedding standoff devices are designed for easy deployment, then they improve ease of operation, but they may lack structural stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment easeVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The rotational leg mechanism provides easy deployment through simple lifting and positioning actions. Once deployed, the geometric configuration of the legs creates a stable triangular or pyramidal structure that is inherently rigid. The stabilizing feet at the end of each leg further enhance stability by providing broad contact surfaces with the mattress, ensuring the device remains stable despite the simple deployment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The legs are pre-configured with hinge joints and stabilizing feet in positions that automatically provide stability when deployed. This preliminary design ensures that no additional stabilization actions are needed during or after deployment, maintaining both ease of operation and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12303034B1System and method for reducing foot contact with bedding
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 BEDCOVERS FOOT BUNKER LLC
  • US12303034B1 patent drawing
  • US12303034B1 patent drawing
  • US12303034B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bedding standoff includes a first platelike leg, a second platelike leg offset from the first platelike leg, and a crossbar connecting the first platelike leg to the second platelike leg near a top of the first platelike leg and near a top of the second platelike leg. In some embodiments, the first platelike leg is rotatable relative to the crossbar.