Collapsible Handle and Blade for Instinctive Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional self-defense devices are often ineffective in close-range attacks, require skill or strength to deploy, and are not designed for instinctive use, posing challenges in panic situations.

Innovation Solution

A self-defense device featuring a collapsible handle, arm, and blade that can be easily deployed through an instinctive pulling motion, with a releasable latch and resilient members to extend and retract components for quick access and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional self-defense devices are used, then they can provide some level of protection, but they require skill or strength to deploy and are not effective in close-range panic situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in close-range attackVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses a resilient member that automatically propels the blade forward when the latch is released, eliminating the need for the user to manually extend the blade with hand strength. The device serves itself by using stored elastic energy to complete the deployment action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient member is pre-loaded with elastic energy during the retraction phase, preparing the device for rapid deployment. This preliminary energy storage allows the blade to extend quickly when needed, without requiring strength from the user during the critical moment of deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the blade is kept extended for quick access, then deployment speed improves, but the device becomes unsafe and could be dropped or turned against the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidsafety risk to user
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is nested within the handle when retracted, and the foot is nested within the blade assembly. This nesting configuration protects the sharp blade when not in use and prevents accidental contact with the user, while still allowing rapid deployment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The releasable latch acts as an intermediary mechanism that controls blade extension. It mediates between the user's intent to deploy and the actual blade movement, ensuring the blade only extends when deliberately released and not during normal handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Volume of moving object

If the device is made compact for portability, then it becomes more wearable and accessible, but the blade and handle have less space to extend

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidblade extension length
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device transitions from a compact static form when retracted to an extended dynamic form during deployment. The resilient member enables the blade to dynamically extend beyond the handle's retracted length, providing both portability and sufficient blade length when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The blade extends in a direction perpendicular to the handle's main axis, utilizing spatial dimension efficiently. This allows the blade to achieve sufficient length for effectiveness while keeping the overall device footprint compact when retracted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a releasable latch is added to control blade extension, then safety improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is extracted as a separate, dedicated component with a single focused function. This modular approach simplifies the overall design by isolating the safety control function from the blade extension mechanics, making each component simpler rather than more complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a high state of readiness for sudden close contact attacks, ensuring quick deployment, safety, and compact form-factor, allowing effective defense with minimal training or strength.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient member, such as a spring, that can be compressed between the blade and the second end of the handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A releasable latch is configured to hold the handle in the retracted position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS20250332747A1Self-defense device
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 SLEEPING TIGER LTD
  • US20250332747A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332747A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332747A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-defense device includes a handle, a body, an arm, and a blade. The handle is coupled to the body. The arm is coupled to the body and to the blade. The handle, the arm, and the blade are each configured to move relative to the body between a retracted position and an extended position. A releasable latch is configured to hold the handle in the retracted position.