Collapsible Railcar Deflector for Container Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intermodal shipping containers experience significant aerodynamic drag when transported by train, leading to increased fuel consumption, transport costs, and pollution, and existing solutions to reduce drag either compromise the container's stacking ability, capacity, or require costly redesigns.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible deflector designed as a triangular prism that can be attached to railcars and containers, featuring a base, sidewall, and top wall connected to form an internal volume, which can be bisected by dividers, and includes a bonding complex for secure attachment, allowing it to deflect air while maintaining the container's stacking capability and capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a device is installed to reduce aerodynamic drag, then fuel consumption decreases, but the container's stacking ability or capacity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidstacking ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The deflector is designed to be collapsible rather than fixed, allowing it to be compressed to a small size for stacking during transport, then expanded when needed for drag reduction. This dynamic transformation resolves the contradiction by making the drag-reducing structure adaptable to both operational and storage conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The collapsible deflector can be nested within or alongside containers when not in use, similar to how smaller objects are nested within larger ones. This allows the drag-reducing device to be stored without permanently occupying space that would interfere with stacking capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Loss of energy

If the container design is modified to reduce drag, then aerodynamic efficiency improves, but capacity or stacking capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of modifying the container itself, the drag-reducing function is extracted and implemented through a separate, removable deflector device. This allows aerodynamic improvement without altering the container's design, capacity, or stacking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The deflector acts as an intermediary device positioned between the airflow and the container, providing drag reduction without requiring integration into the container structure. This mediator approach preserves the original container design while achieving aerodynamic benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If a rigid deflector is used to reduce drag, then aerodynamic performance improves, but shipping and storage become cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic drag reductionVSAvoidshipping and storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The deflector transitions from a rigid, bulky form during operation to a collapsed, compact form during storage and shipping. This dynamic capability resolves the contradiction by allowing the structure to adapt its physical state based on operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The deflector is designed with segmented or foldable components that can be collapsed together, reducing its overall volume for storage while maintaining its aerodynamic shape when deployed. This segmentation allows easy shipping and storage without sacrificing drag-reduction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The deflector effectively reduces aerodynamic drag on railcars and containers without altering their design or capacity, while being collapsible for easy shipping and durable enough to withstand environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the rectangular shape of the container, although useful for maximizing capacity and stacking capability, is not aerodynamically efficient. When transported by train, the gap in between the train cars causes much of this aerodynamic resistance.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3966088B1Deflector for vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 DEFLECT LLC
  • EP3966088B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3966088B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3966088B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A deflector for use with railcars and containers. The deflector may be used to retrofit railcars and other container to reduce aerodynamic drag. The deflector may be collapsible for use with stacked containers.