Collapsible Frame for Mobile Platform Interior Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The installation of mobile platform interior structures is typically time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly, as monolithic, pre-assembled structures require heavy equipment for lifting and moving, and are difficult to remove for upgrades or inspections.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight collapsible frame that can be easily carried through a man-door in a collapsed state, expanded to form a load-bearing structure, with interchangeable panels attached to create interior surfaces, allowing for installation without heavy equipment and easy removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If monolithic pre-assembled structures are used for mobile platform interior structures, then structural strength and stability are improved, but installation complexity and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interior structure is divided into multiple modular panels that can be assembled separately and then connected to form the complete structure. Each panel is a self-contained module with standardized connection interfaces, allowing the structure to be built in sections rather than as one monolithic piece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels are designed to nest within each other during storage and transport, with smaller panels fitting inside larger ones. This nesting arrangement reduces the space required for storage and simplifies handling while maintaining the structural integrity of individual panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Stability of the object's composition

If monolithic pre-assembled structures are used, then structural integrity is improved, but installation time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The panels are pre-assembled and pre-positioned in a controlled environment before being installed in the mobile platform. Connection interfaces are pre-prepared and tested, allowing for rapid installation without requiring complex on-site assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The structure incorporates movable and adjustable components that allow panels to be easily inserted, removed, and repositioned. Connection mechanisms include movable locking elements and adjustable fasteners that simplify the installation and modification process while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If monolithic structures are used, then structural strength is improved, but ease of removal and reconfiguration decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidease of removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is segmented into discrete panels with standardized connection interfaces, allowing individual panels to be removed and replaced without affecting the entire structure. This modular approach enables selective reconfiguration while maintaining the strength of the overall assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows for easy removal and replacement of panels, with used panels being recovered and reused in other configurations. Connection mechanisms are designed to facilitate rapid disassembly and reuse of components, reducing waste and enabling sustainable reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of manufacture

If heavy equipment is used for installation, then ability to install monolithic structures is improved, but cost and complexity of installation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to installVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into manageable panel modules that can be handled and installed using standard equipment and manual labor, eliminating the need for heavy lifting equipment. Each panel is sized and weighted for ease of handling while maintaining structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels incorporate self-aligning and self-locking features that allow installers to position and secure panels without requiring specialized equipment or complex alignment procedures. Connection interfaces automatically guide proper positioning and secure attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8875400B2Method for installing a collapsible mobile platform interior structure
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 THE BOEING CO
  • US8875400B2 patent drawing
  • US8875400B2 patent drawing
  • US8875400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for installing an interior structure for a mobile platform is provided. The method may involve carrying a lightweight collapsible frame through a man-door of a mobile platform while the collapsible frame is in a collapsed state. The collapsed frame may then be expanded to provide at least a portion of a load bearing frame for a mobile platform interior structure. A plurality of interchangeable panels may be attached to the collapsible frame to form interior surfaces of the mobile platform interior structure.