Supporting apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supporting devices for users such as infants, elderly, and pets lack portability, flexibility, and effective support, particularly during bathing and traveling, as they are often rigid, non-flexible, and not easily reconfigurable to accommodate different user shapes, sizes, and ages.

Innovation Solution

A portable and collapsible supporting apparatus with a frame member, movable leg assemblies, and a suspender system that allows for customizable support configurations, enabling easy storage, transportation, and use in various settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid molded plastic structures are used, then structural strength is improved, but portability and flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple rigid segments connected by flexible joints. Each segment maintains structural strength through rigid construction, while the joints between segments provide flexibility and adaptability. This segmentation allows the structure to be both strong and flexible, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure incorporates movable joints and adjustable components that allow it to dynamically change its configuration. The rigid segments remain structurally sound while the dynamic joints enable the structure to adapt to different positions and user requirements, simultaneously achieving strength and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If fixed position structures are used, then stability is improved, but adaptability to different user positions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidadaptability to different positions
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure uses dynamic joints and movable components that allow it to achieve stable configurations at multiple different positions. Each configured position provides stability through proper structural arrangement, while the ability to reconfigure between positions provides adaptability to different user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The structure allows changes in geometric parameters such as joint angles and segment orientations to adapt to different user positions. By adjusting these parameters, the structure maintains stability in each configuration while providing versatility across multiple positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex reconfiguration mechanisms are used, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereconfigurabilityVSAvoidease of setup
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The structure incorporates self-locking joints and gravity-assisted mechanisms that automatically stabilize the structure during reconfiguration. Users simply need to initiate the movement, and the structure's own weight and mechanical features complete the reconfiguration and locking without requiring complex manual operations or specialized tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces simple intermediary elements such as spring-loaded locks, friction joints, or gravity-based mechanisms that mediate between the user's simple action and the complex reconfiguration process. These intermediaries automate the complexity, allowing users to easily reconfigure the structure without dealing with complex mechanisms directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If foldable leg assemblies are used, then portability is improved, but perceived stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidperceived stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The leg assemblies are segmented into foldable sections connected by rigid joints. When deployed, these segments form a stable geometric structure with proper triangulation or bracing that provides perceived stability. When collapsed, the same segments provide compact portability. The segmentation allows the structure to excel at both portability and stability in their respective states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12207740B2Supporting apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 TRAVEL BABIES LLC
  • US12207740B2 patent drawing
  • US12207740B2 patent drawing
  • US12207740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments of the invention relate to a supporting apparatus and methods of using it. The supporting apparatus may include a frame member including an outer periphery and an inner periphery. The supporting apparatus may further include a first leg assembly and a second leg assembly, each configurable between a closed position and an open position. The supporting apparatus may further include a suspender that may be fastened to the frame member through a plurality of straps. The suspender may include a central member that may be positioned in a region enclosed by the inner periphery of the frame member.