Collapsible Spinal Anchor for Pedicle Screw Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal realignment surgeries face limitations in achieving effective axial and coronal corrections due to the risk of pedicle screw failure and fracture from laterally applied forces, which restricts the amount of correction achievable in the spine's sagittal, coronal, and axial planes.

Innovation Solution

An anchor apparatus with a collapsible design, featuring foldable wings and a locking mechanism, is inserted between vertebrae to apply corrective forces, allowing for deployment and realignment of the spine by expanding its lateral profile, thereby minimizing the risk of pedicle screw failure and enhancing correction capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If pedicle screws are used to apply corrective forces to the spine, then spinal realignment can be achieved, but the risk of pedicle screw failure and fracture increases due to laterally applied forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrective forceVSAvoidpedicle screw reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediate device (spinal realignment system with rods and anchors) that mediates between the surgeon's corrective intent and the spine. Instead of directly loading pedicle screws with lateral corrective forces, the system uses rods that can be bent into the desired spinal configuration and anchored at multiple points, distributing forces along the spinal column rather than concentrating them at screw-bone interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from applying corrective forces primarily in the axial direction (through pedicle screws) to utilizing three-dimensional rod bending and anchoring systems. The rods can be configured in complex spatial arrangements that address sagittal, coronal, and axial plane deformities simultaneously, distributing corrective forces across multiple dimensions and reducing reliance on lateral screw loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Shape

If laterally applied forces are used for spinal correction, then axial and coronal alignment can be improved, but pedicle screw failure and fracture risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal alignmentVSAvoidpedicle screw strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic rod bending techniques where rods are progressively shaped to match the desired spinal curvature during surgery. The system allows for incremental adjustment of spinal alignment through controlled rod deformation and sequential anchoring, enabling the spine to be realigned in stages rather than through single high-force lateral applications that would compromise screw integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spinal correction is divided into multiple discrete anchoring points along the spinal column. Rather than applying a single large lateral force through one or two pedicle screws, the correction is segmented into multiple smaller force vectors distributed across several anchor points, with each segment bearing a fraction of the total corrective load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional spinal reconstruction techniques are used, then some realignment can be achieved, but the amount of axial and coronal correction is limited due to pedicle screw failure risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal realignment precisionVSAvoidcorrection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent describes a universal spinal realignment system that can address multiple types of spinal deformities (sagittal imbalance, coronal plane deformities, axial rotation) using the same basic components (rods, anchors, bending tools). The system is versatile enough to accommodate various surgical approaches and patient anatomies, enabling comprehensive correction across all three spinal planes without requiring specialized hardware for each deformity type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230200795A1Systems and methods for spinal realignment
Publication Date: 2023.06.29 DIGNITY HEALTH
  • US20230200795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230200795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230200795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of an anchor and intradiscal implant for surgical realignment of a misaligned spine are disclosed herein.