A collapsible power-driven table stand, and a table comprising such a table stand

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collapsible power-driven table stands are inefficient in terms of assembly, length-adjustment, and collapsing mechanisms, often requiring numerous parts and manual steps, which can lead to wiring visibility and interference risks and inefficient operation.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible power-driven table stand design featuring a supporting body with an elongated main support structure comprising a central beam and lateral beams, guide means for length adjustment, and a limiter arrangement to prevent excessive displacement, along with a simplified anchoring system using fewer components, concealing wiring and allowing easy extension and collapse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If numerous screws and separate components are used to anchor sidewing brackets and stands to rectangular columns, then the structural strength and stability are improved, but the device complexity and assembly time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the sidewing brackets and rectangular columns into a unified supporting body structure where the brackets are formed as integral parts of the columns rather than separate components requiring multiple screws for attachment. This merging reduces the number of fastening elements while maintaining structural integrity through the unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting body structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support, houses the controller, contains wiring channels, and enables pivotal attachment of stands. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated components for each function, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If numerous screws and separate components are used to anchor sidewing brackets and stands to rectangular columns, then the structural stability is improved, but the assembly time and manual steps increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the sidewing brackets and rectangular columns into an integral supporting body structure, the patent eliminates multiple separate assembly steps involving individual screw fastenings. The unified structure reduces assembly operations to simpler attachment processes while maintaining structural stability through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If wirings are routed between the controller and driving units in the receiving slot, then the electrical connections are established, but the wirings become visible and susceptible to interference from user bodyparts or foreign objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical connection reliabilityVSAvoidwiring interference risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the wirings from the exposed receiving slot area and routes them through dedicated wiring channels that are concealed within the supporting body structure. This separation removes the harmful factor of wiring exposure while maintaining the electrical connections between the controller and driving units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of repair

If the design uses separate screws for anchoring sidewing brackets and stands to rectangular columns, then the ease of repair is improved, but the device complexity and base material amount increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent replaceabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting body structure is designed as a universal component that integrates multiple functions: structural support, controller housing, wiring routing, and stand attachment. This consolidation reduces device complexity while maintaining repairability through modular attachment points designed for straightforward replacement of individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3541240B1A collapsible power-driven table stand, and a table comprising such a table stand
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 POLSTIERNAN IND AB
  • EP3541240B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3541240B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3541240B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A collapsible power-driven table stand (1) has a supporting body (10) having an elongated main support structure (11) extending in a longitudinal direction (L), and first and second stands (20, 20') comprising first and second driving units (21, 21') and one or more first and second telescopic leg sections (22, 22'), respectively, driven by the first and second driving units (21, 21') to move axially relative to each other. The first and second stands (20, 20') are pivotally attached to the supporting body (10) at or near its respective ends in order to allow the first and second stands (20, 20') to extend or collapse relative to the supporting body (10). The elongated main support structure (11) comprises an elongated central beam (40) formed by a bottom surface (41) and first and second side walls (42, 42') extending perpendicularly from the bottom surface, the central beam having a generally U-shaped cross-section. It also comprises elongated first and second lateral beams (30, 30') formed by respective first and second side walls (32, 33, 32', 33') and bottom surfaces (31, 31') extending perpendicularly between the first and second side walls along proximal portions (34, 34') of the first and second lateral beams, respectively. The first and second lateral beams have a generally U- shaped cross-section at the proximal portions. A respective proximal end (36, 36') of the proximal portions (34, 34') of the first and second lateral beams (30, 30') is open for slidably receiving the central beam (40) from a first end (41a) thereof, whereas respective distal portions (35, 35') of the first and second lateral beams (30, 30') are connected to the first stand and second stands (20, 20'). Guide means (50; 60) are provided for guiding the central beam (40) to be slidably supported on the bottom surfaces (31, 31') of the first and second lateral beams (30, 30'). The supporting body (10) is length-adjustable in the longitudinal direction (L) by displacing the first lateral beam (30) and/or second lateral beam (30') with respect to the central beam (40) in the longitudinal direction.