Collapsible Wall-Mounted Package Receiving Device for Secure Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing package receiving devices are bulky, heavy, complex, and expensive, making them inefficient and costly for temporary and secure storage of packages.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible package receiving device with a frame and pivotable panels that can be attached to a wall or vehicle, allowing for a compact, lightweight, and cost-effective solution that expands into a lockable rectangular volume for secure package storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional package receiving devices are used, then secure package storage is achieved, but the devices become bulky, heavy, and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure package storageVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into a frame structure with multiple pivotable panels (front panel, back panel, side panels, top panel, bottom panel) that can independently fold and deploy. This segmentation allows the device to maintain structural integrity for secure storage while reducing overall material usage and weight compared to traditional solid constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements pivotable panels connected through hinges and locking mechanisms that allow the device to transition between collapsed and expanded states. This dynamic structure enables the device to be lightweight and compact when not in use, yet provide rigid secure storage when deployed, resolving the contradiction between weight and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If traditional package receiving devices are used, then secure package storage is achieved, but the devices become bulky and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure package storageVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the device into modular panels that fold along predetermined lines, the complex function of secure storage is achieved through simple geometric transformations rather than complex mechanical systems. Each panel performs a single function (front, back, side, top, bottom) and combines to form the complete storage structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device collapses into a compact flat configuration where panels nest against the frame structure, minimizing space and simplifying the apparent complexity. The nested collapsed state contrasts with the expanded functional state, providing secure storage without permanent bulk or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If traditional package receiving devices are used, then secure package storage is achieved, but the devices become expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure package storageVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented panel design allows for simplified manufacturing of individual components that can be produced more cheaply than traditional monolithic devices. The frame and panels can be manufactured separately using standard fabrication processes, reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining security functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the structural parameters from solid, permanent construction to foldable, variable geometry construction. This parameter change enables the use of lighter, less expensive materials that can still provide secure storage when properly configured and locked, reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Volume of moving object

If collapsible design is used, then compact storage is achieved, but structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestored configuration volumeVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic pivotable panel design with locking mechanisms provides structural strength when needed (in expanded locked configuration) while enabling compact storage when not in use. The locking mechanism transforms the flexible folded structure into a rigid storage container, resolving the contradiction between compactness and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure is pre-configured with attachment points and hinge locations that ensure proper panel alignment and structural integrity when deployed. This preliminary structural preparation allows the panels to form strong joints and maintain structural strength during use, despite the collapsible nature of the design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11666169B1Package receiving device
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 ALTMAIER JEFF
  • US11666169B1 patent drawing
  • US11666169B1 patent drawing
  • US11666169B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A package receiving device mountable to an exterior wall of a home or business structure that is collapsible into a flat stored configuration and expandable into a lockable package receiving receptacle having a rectangular volume adapted to temporarily store packages therein. Pivotable panels are adapted to allow the package receiving device to be moved between a stored configuration and expand into an in-use configuration.