Collapsible Wheel Cover With Articulating Attachment System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wheel covers for commercial vehicles are difficult and time-consuming to install and do not facilitate easy pre-trip inspections, requiring operators to often uninstall them for hub and wheel inspections.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible wheel cover with an articulating attachment system, including a locking door, hinge points, spring attachments, and retaining features, allowing for quick installation and integration of an inspection door/window for maintenance access, while being compact for shipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If traditional wheel covers are installed manually, then aerodynamic coverage is achieved, but installation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic coverageVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel cover is divided into multiple segments that can be independently manipulated. Each segment can be folded back against adjacent segments, allowing the entire cover to be collapsed into a compact configuration for quick installation and removal, thereby reducing installation time while maintaining aerodynamic coverage when deployed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel cover incorporates dynamic folding mechanisms that allow it to transition between extended (aerodynamic) and collapsed (compact) states. This dynamic capability enables rapid installation and removal without manual disassembly of multiple fasteners, directly addressing the installation time issue while preserving aerodynamic performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Shape

If wheel covers are fully installed for aerodynamic performance, then hub and wheel coverage is achieved, but pre-trip inspection accessibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic coverageVSAvoidinspection accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel cover includes segmented sections with gaps or openings that allow visual and physical inspection of the hub and wheel through the cover structure itself. Operators can inspect critical components without completely removing the wheel cover, maintaining aerodynamic coverage while enabling required pre-trip inspections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel cover design incorporates intermediary inspection access points that mediate between the need for continuous aerodynamic coverage and the need for inspection access. These access points allow operators to inspect hub and wheel components through the cover structure without full removal, resolving the contradiction between aerodynamic performance and inspection accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If wheel covers are designed for secure installation, then attachment reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidattachment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system is segmented into multiple simple fastening points distributed around the wheel cover perimeter. Each segment uses a simple snap-fit or clip mechanism that provides reliable attachment when engaged, while the distributed nature of these simple mechanisms avoids the complexity of a single complex locking system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel cover attachment system incorporates self-aligning and self-latching features that automatically engage when the cover is placed on the wheel. The segmented design with multiple attachment points provides inherent stability and reliability without requiring complex manual adjustment or multiple fastening steps, thereby achieving reliable attachment with minimal system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the installation process, enables efficient pre-trip inspections without full removal, and ensures secure, aerodynamic coverage, while being compact for storage and transport.

Implementation Method 1

at least two spring attachments rotatably connected to the at least two hinge points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9302536B2Wheel cover
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 CONSOLIDATED METCO INC
  • US9302536B2 patent drawing
  • US9302536B2 patent drawing
  • US9302536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A commercial vehicle wheel cover including a frame having a locking door, at least two hinge points, at least two spring attachments, and at least two retaining features. The frame has a front side and a back side, with the at least two hinge points arranged integrally and circumferentially on the back side of the frame. The at least two spring attachments are rotatably connected to the at least two hinge points. The at least two retaining features are located adjacent to said at least two hinge points in the radial direction, and the at least two spring attachments are secured in the at least two retaining features. One of the at least two hinge points is located on the locking door. The locking door is used to install the final spring attachment on the drop center or hub of a wheel.