Collated Fencing Staple Geometry for Stable Powered Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fencing staples require multiple pieces or geometries for collated control, which can obstruct the line of sight and hinder reliable driving by powered fastening tools into fence posts, necessitating a staple design that maintains consistent orientation and secure grip.

Innovation Solution

A fencing staple with a crown section and leg section, featuring radiused portions, barbs, and divergent points for secure engagement, allowing serial collation and stable feeding into fastening tools, and an adhesive material for connecting staples, ensuring consistent orientation and easy loading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple pieces or geometries are used for collated staple control, then staple control is improved, but line of sight to the workpiece is obstructed and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestaple controlVSAvoidnumber of control pieces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple control functions into a single integrated staple geometry. The crown portion's specific shape (width greater than leg width, radiused edges) provides both collation control and orientation stability without requiring separate control pieces or cover components, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining reliable staple control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the control function from separate cover components and embeds it directly into the staple's crown geometry. The radiused edges and width differential of the crown portion inherently provide control during collation and feeding, eliminating the need for additional control pieces that would obstruct the line of sight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If traditional staple geometries are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but consistent orientation during feeding is not maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistent orientationVSAvoidstaple geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric geometry in the crown portion, where the crown width is deliberately made greater than the leg width, and radiused edges are positioned specifically. This asymmetric design creates a natural orientation reference that ensures consistent staple alignment during feeding through the powered fastening tool, improving ease of operation without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Strength

If barbs are added to enhance grip, then holding power is improved, but driving reliability into the workpiece deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding powerVSAvoiddriving reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies barbs only to specific locations on the leg portions, not along the entire length. This localized application provides enhanced holding power in the workpiece while maintaining a smooth driving surface at the tip and along the majority of the leg, ensuring reliable driving into the workpiece without the trade-off that would result from full-length barbs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11073174B2Fencing staple
Publication Date: 2021.07.27 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US11073174B2 patent drawing
  • US11073174B2 patent drawing
  • US11073174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A barbed staple for installing fencing wire onto a fence post. The staple has a crown section and a leg section. The crown section has an arcuate crown portion and a radiused portion, and the leg section has a pair of leg portions that extend in parallel from the radiused portion of the crown section. At least one barb protrudes from each of the leg portions, the barb having projecting points. The distance between the distal edge of the projecting points defines an outer leg width. The crown portion of the crown section has a greater width than the pair of leg portions in parallel. The outer crown width is greater than the outer leg width.