Collection Device with Removable Base and Remote Latch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collection devices are inadequate for handling large or heavy materials, particularly in constrained spaces like construction sites, as they often require manual transfer and lack efficient dumping mechanisms, especially when access by forklifts or disposal trucks is difficult.

Innovation Solution

A collection device with a releasable bottom, featuring a latch and actuator controlled remotely, allowing for secure attachment and easy release of the base, enabling efficient dumping of materials without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If larger containers are used to handle heavy materials, then the capacity to hold heavy materials is improved, but the ability to access and dump materials in constrained spaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacity to hold heavy materialsVSAvoidaccessibility in constrained spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into two main segments: a removable base and an enclosure. This segmentation allows the container to be transported as a complete unit for stability and capacity, yet the base can be separately removed for dumping materials in constrained spaces without requiring full container removal or manual handling of materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base transitions from a static, permanently attached state to a dynamic, removable state through the latch mechanism. When the latch is engaged, the base remains fixed for stable transport; when the latch is released, the base can be removed to enable material dumping, providing adaptability to different operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If manual transfer of materials is used, then the requirement for specialized equipment is reduced, but the labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment requirementsVSAvoidmaterial handling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The container performs the dumping function itself through the removable base mechanism, eliminating the need for external equipment like forklifts or cranes to remove materials. The system serves its own dumping needs by simply removing the base, significantly reducing labor intensity and time consumption compared to manual transfer methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If the base is permanently attached to the enclosure, then the structural integrity is improved, but the ability to release and dump materials deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidability to release and dump materials
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The base attachment system transitions from static (permanently attached) to dynamic (removable) through the latch mechanism. The latch provides a strong, secure connection during transport to maintain structural integrity, but can be easily released when material dumping is required, providing both strength and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The permanent attachment is replaced with a segmented attachment system where the base and enclosure are separate components connected by the latch. This segmentation maintains structural integrity when connected while enabling easy separation when needed, resolving the contradiction between strength and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If remote actuation is implemented, then the safety and ease of operation are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation capabilityVSAvoidactuator and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical operation of the latch is replaced with an automated actuator system that can be controlled remotely. This substitution provides safe remote operation capability while the actuator integrates compactly with the existing latch mechanism, minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12054366B2Collection device with releasable bottom
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 SMITH JR WILLIAM PENFIELD
  • US12054366B2 patent drawing
  • US12054366B2 patent drawing
  • US12054366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collection device can include an enclosure defining a top opening and a bottom opening; a latch coupled to the enclosure and configured to selectively secure a base to the enclosure proximate to the bottom opening; and an actuator coupled to the latch, the actuator controlled remotely and configured to open the latch and thereby release the base.