Collective Device Control Suggestions for High-Cost Facility Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face inconvenience when individually operating multiple devices due to high operation costs, such as time and effort, especially when frequent or repetitive operations are required, and existing solutions do not provide effective collective control for purposes other than energy saving.

Innovation Solution

A control method that acquires operation information on groups of operations performed on multiple devices, calculates an operation cost based on factors like time, labor, and movement distance, and generates suggestion information for collective control when the cost exceeds a predetermined value, allowing users to opt for simultaneous control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual control of multiple devices is performed using respective switches, then device control functionality is achieved, but user convenience deteriorates due to high operation cost including time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual device operations into a single collective control operation. The control device groups multiple devices and allows users to control them simultaneously through one operation, merging what would otherwise require multiple separate switch operations into a single action, thereby reducing operation time and improving convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control device provides universal control capability across multiple different devices. Instead of requiring device-specific switches, a single control device can operate multiple devices with different functions, making the control system multi-functional and reducing the need for multiple specialized control elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If individual control of multiple devices is performed using respective switches, then device control functionality is achieved, but operation complexity increases due to multiple operation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidcontrol operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple control operations into a single collective control command. By grouping devices and enabling simultaneous control through one operation, the system reduces the number of operation steps from multiple individual switch operations to a single unified action, simplifying the control process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Use of energy by moving object

If collective control suggestion is provided based on electric power saving advice, then energy efficiency is improved, but applicability to other purposes deteriorates due to limited scope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidapplication scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the collective control suggestion system beyond energy saving to multiple purposes including convenience improvement and operation simplification. The system evaluates operation costs based on multiple criteria such as time, effort, and frequency, enabling collective control suggestions for various scenarios not limited to power consumption optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from solely energy consumption to multiple parameters including operation time, effort, and frequency. This parameter expansion allows the system to provide collective control suggestions based on diverse criteria, making the system adaptable to different application scenarios beyond just energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If frequent operations are performed on multiple devices, then device functionality is utilized, but operation cost increases due to repetitive actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation frequencyVSAvoidtotal operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges repetitive individual operations into collective control actions. When multiple devices require frequent operations, the system groups them and enables simultaneous control, reducing the total operation time from multiple separate actions to fewer unified operations, thereby improving productivity without increasing time cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240231296A1Control method, information processing apparatus, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • US20240231296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240231296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240231296A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method by an information processing apparatus includes: acquiring operation information on a group of operations continuously performed to a plurality of devices disposed in a facility; calculating an operation cost required to perform the group of operations indicated by the operation information; generating, in a case that the operation cost is larger than a predetermined value, suggestion information indicative of a suggestion for performing collective control of the group of operations indicated by the operation information to the devices; and outputting the suggestion information.