Collector-Up Bipolar Transistor Base Resistance Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bipolar transistors face a trade-off between high power performance, high frequency performance, and cost, with conventional designs struggling to optimize maximum oscillation frequency (fMAX) due to the limitations of base resistance and collector-base capacitance, where reducing one parameter often worsens the other.

Innovation Solution

The use of a bottom-up bipolar transistor with a laterally extending collector that extends past the base edge, allowing for improved breakdown performance and flexibility in device layout, combined with a dielectric layer for mechanical stability and a collector gate for field shaping, which enhances breakdown voltage and cut-off frequency without increasing base resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the base resistance is reduced by increasing the doping level in the base, then the maximum oscillation frequency fMAX is improved, but the collector current decreases and consequently fT is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum oscillation frequency fMAXVSAvoidcollector current
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different doping levels in different regions of the base. The extrinsic base region has higher doping to reduce resistance and improve fMAX, while the intrinsic base region maintains lower doping to preserve collector current and fT. This spatial differentiation of doping quality resolves the contradiction between reducing base resistance and maintaining collector current.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the collector-base capacitance CBC is reduced by changing device architecture, then the maximum oscillation frequency fMAX is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum oscillation frequency fMAXVSAvoiddevice architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional transistor architecture by placing the collector above the base instead of below it. This inverted configuration naturally reduces the collector-base capacitance CBC because the collector contact area with the base is minimized, directly improving fMAX without requiring complex architectural modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Power

If long finger-like transistor shapes are used to increase transistor area and current, then the output power is improved, but the intrinsic base resistance increases and fMAX deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput powerVSAvoidmaximum oscillation frequency fMAX
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the base region into extrinsic and intrinsic portions, allowing the transistor to use long finger-like shapes for increased area and power while the extrinsic base region compensates for the increased intrinsic base resistance. This segmentation enables both high power and high frequency performance to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2784822B1Collector-up bipolar transistor and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2018.12.19 NXP BV
  • EP2784822B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2
  • EP2784822B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2784822B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A semiconductor device and a method of making the same. The device includes a semiconductor substrate. The device also includes a bipolar transistor on the semiconductor substrate. The bipolar transistor includes an emitter. The bipolar transistor also includes a base located above the emitter. The bipolar transistor further includes a laterally extending collector located above the base. The collector includes a portion that extends past an edge of the base.