Collet Latch Locking Fingers for Tamper-Resistant Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lockable devices, such as lockboxes, face challenges in providing secure and efficient access control mechanisms that are resistant to attacks and vandalism, particularly in ensuring that only authorized users can access the stored keys or access aids.

Innovation Solution

A locking module with movable locking fingers biased by a compression spring mechanism, controlled by an actuator that adjusts the compression force to selectively lock or unlock the device, allowing for secure coupling and decoupling of components, such as a shackle or keybox, using a cable element with a tip to restrict movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking mechanism with multiple locking fingers is used to secure components, then the security and tamper-resistance are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element is divided into multiple locking fingers (at least three) that can independently engage with the cable element. This segmentation provides enhanced security through multiple engagement points while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure where all fingers are controlled by a single biasing mechanism and actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple locking fingers are combined into a single integrated locking element that is controlled by one biasing mechanism and one actuator. This merging approach provides enhanced security through multiple locking points while avoiding the complexity of having separate control systems for each finger.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If locking fingers are biased to open position for easy insertion, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of locked position decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of insertionVSAvoidlocked position reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing mechanism pre-biases the locking fingers to the open position, creating a ready state that facilitates easy insertion. The actuator then applies a counteracting force to overcome this bias and secure the fingers in the closed locked position, ensuring both ease of operation and reliable locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking fingers are designed to be dynamically movable between open and closed positions rather than being fixed. The biasing mechanism continuously applies force to maintain readiness for opening, while the actuator dynamically engages to secure the locked position, creating a system that adapts to operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If an actuator controls the compression force of biasing mechanism, then the access control security is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control securityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator serves multiple functions: it controls the compression force of the biasing mechanism, thereby controlling the positioning of locking fingers, and also serves as part of the access control system. This multi-functionality enhances security while minimizing the addition of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator is designed to directly interact with the biasing mechanism to control the locking fingers' positioning. This self-service approach allows the actuator to perform multiple control functions without requiring additional intermediate mechanisms, enhancing security while limiting complexity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective, secure, and tamper-resistant access control mechanism that ensures authorized access to the lockable device, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and vandalism while maintaining simplicity in configuration.

Implementation Method 1

A biasing mechanism is coupled to the locking element and a compression force applied by the biasing mechanism to the plurality of locking fingers controls movement of the plurality of locking fingers between the open position and the closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11428029B2Collet latch
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11428029B2 patent drawing
  • US11428029B2 patent drawing
  • US11428029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking module for selectively coupling a first component and a second component of a lockable device includes a locking element including a plurality of locking fingers movable between an open position and a closed position. The plurality of locking fingers being biased to said open position. A biasing mechanism is coupled to said locking element and a compression force applied by said biasing mechanism to said plurality of locking fingers controls movement of said plurality of locking fingers between said open position and said closed position. An actuator associated with said biasing mechanism is operable to control said compression force to selectively lock said locking element.