Collimated Detector 3D Mapping Nuclear Contamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the depth distribution of radionuclides in nuclear facilities, particularly in concrete enclosures, are inadequate for sources of unknown shape and are not suitable for rapid, precise, in-situ assessment, limiting the optimization of waste sorting and radiation protection during dismantling.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using a collimated radiation detector to perform measurements at different distances and energies, analyzing the data by subdividing the cylindrical region into meshes to estimate radioactivity levels through an inversion of a linear system, allowing for non-destructive, in-situ characterization of radiological contamination without assumptions about the depth distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional in-situ measurement methods are used to determine radionuclide depth distribution, then measurement speed is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately determine depth distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoiddepth distribution determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional surface-level or single-point depth measurements to a three-dimensional mapping approach. By using a collimated detector that scans and maps radioactivity in three dimensions (x, y, z coordinates), the system simultaneously achieves rapid measurement and precise depth distribution determination, resolving the contradiction between speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If spectrochemical analyzes of cored elements are performed in the laboratory, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to laboratory processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation contamination determination accuracyVSAvoidtime for core sampling and laboratory analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical and chemical processes of core sampling, transportation, and laboratory spectrochemical analysis with a non-destructive in-situ gamma spectrometry measurement system. The collimated detector directly measures radionuclide depth distribution in the concrete structure without physical sampling, eliminating time losses while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system performs the analysis directly at the measurement location using the existing radionuclides in the concrete structure as the source. The in-situ gamma spectrometry system utilizes the natural gamma emissions from the contaminated concrete without requiring external sampling or transportation, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating laboratory processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If methods assuming uniform spatial distribution of radionuclides are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to characterize heterogeneous sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement method simplicityVSAvoidheterogeneous source characterization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the concrete structure into multiple discrete volumetric elements or voxels in three-dimensional space. Each voxel is independently characterized for its radionuclide content and depth distribution. This segmentation allows the system to model heterogeneous sources accurately while maintaining manageable computational complexity through systematic processing of individual elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different measurement and analysis parameters to different spatial locations within the concrete structure. The collimated detector measures local radioactivity characteristics at each position, and the analysis adapts to local heterogeneities in radionuclide distribution. This local quality approach enables precise characterization of heterogeneous sources without requiring overly complex global measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If invasive core sampling methods are used to determine depth distribution, then measurement precision is improved, but object-generated harmful factors increase due to destruction of the inspected structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth distribution measurement accuracyVSAvoidstructural damage from core sampling
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces invasive mechanical core sampling with non-destructive gamma spectrometry measurements. The collimated detector measures radionuclide depth distribution through external gamma ray detection without physical contact or damage to the concrete structure, eliminating harmful effects while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses gamma radiation as an intermediary to obtain information about radionuclide depth distribution without direct physical intervention in the concrete structure. The gamma rays penetrate the concrete and carry information about the radionuclide distribution, allowing indirect measurement that avoids structural damage while achieving high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate, rapid determination of radiological contamination depth, optimizing waste separation and classification, and improving radiation protection by providing a three-dimensional map of contamination levels in nuclear facilities.

Implementation Method 1

perform several measurements of the radiation received by the radiation detector (2) for different emission energies and different distances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGamma radiation detection: Radiation

Implementation Method 2

The radiation detector (2) is collimated to receive radiation from a cylindrical region (25)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCollimation: Filter (optical)

Implementation Method 3

C is a matrix having as components pre-calculated values as a function: of the emission energies of the radiation in the measurements carried out; distances, during the measurements carried out, between the radiation detector (2) and the surface (20)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP2880661B1Method and system for inspecting a nuclear facility
Publication Date: 2017.07.12 SOLETANCHE FREYSSINET SAS
  • EP2880661B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2880661B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2880661B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The method for inspecting a nuclear facility comprises the steps consisting of: placing a radiation detector (2) in front of a surface of a portion of the facility (1), the radiation detector (2) being collimated to receive radiation from a cylindrical region of the portion of the facility; carrying out a plurality of measurements of radiation received by the radiation detector for different transmission energies and different distances, along the axis of the cylindrical region, between the radiation detector and surface of the portion of the facility; and analysing the radiation measurements by subdividing the cylindrical region into a plurality of meshes (3) so as to estimate respective levels of radioactivity in the meshes (3).