Collimated Detector Layout for Real-Time Radiation Dose Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying radiation dose in large volumes of products are time-consuming, prone to errors, and fail to distinguish between errors originating from the product or the irradiation system, leading to inefficient and potentially harmful over- or under-irradiation.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using a series of detectors with collimators positioned to face a radiation source, measuring radiation dose in real-time by comparing signals from multiple detectors to determine if errors originate from the product or the irradiation system, ensuring accurate dose verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a detector is placed behind the product to measure radiation dose, then real-time dose verification is enabled, but it cannot distinguish whether errors originate from the product or the irradiation system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose verification capabilityVSAvoiderror source identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the measurement function into two separate detector positions: one detector measures the radiation beam before it interacts with the product (reference measurement), while another detector measures the beam after passing through the product (transmitted measurement). This segmentation allows the system to compare the two measurements and determine whether deviations originate from the product or the irradiation system, thereby resolving the information loss problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a detector is placed in front of the product to analyze the emerging beam, then irradiation system problems can be detected, but the distance between the x-ray converter and conveyor must be increased, decreasing energy efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveirradiation system monitoringVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The detector system is designed to perform multiple functions: it can measure both the reference beam (for system monitoring) and the transmitted beam (for product dose verification). By using the same detector for both purposes at different time points or positions, the system achieves reliable irradiation system monitoring without requiring additional detectors that would necessitate increased distance and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If a detector is placed directly behind the x-ray converter, then real-time monitoring is achieved, but the detector experiences rapid saturation and temperature rise, decreasing sensitivity and requiring heavier cooling systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time monitoring speedVSAvoiddetector sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the reference beam before the product is irradiated. This preliminary action allows the detector to capture the full beam intensity without saturation, and then use this reference data to calculate the transmitted dose through the product. By separating the high-intensity reference measurement from the product measurement, the detector avoids rapid saturation and temperature rise while maintaining sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If standard calibration and verification practices are used to ensure appropriate radiation dose, then dose accuracy can be confirmed, but the process becomes time-consuming and incomplete as it verifies dose at only one single point of the pallet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures the radiation beam throughout the entire irradiation process using detectors positioned to capture the transmitted beam. This continuous measurement provides real-time verification of the radiation dose delivered to the product, replacing the traditional discontinuous point-check method. The continuous action enables complete pallet verification without increasing time consumption, as measurements occur during normal irradiation operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time detection and differentiation of errors, reducing the risk of under- or over-irradiation, and improving the efficiency and accuracy of radiation treatment processes.

Implementation Method 1

measuring at least a reference signal Sdn,PQ(t) of the radiation dose by at least one detector of a series of at least two detectors during a performance qualification step received by a reference product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray radiation detection: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

a series of at least two detectors comprising each a detecting part and a collimator placed at a predetermined distance from the radiation source in such a way that the said at least two detectors are arranged in a plane facing a converter generating the irradiation beam and pointing to a same target zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCollimation: Filter (optical)

Data Source

PatentUS12578485B2Radiation measuring method, apparatus and device
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 ION BEAM APPL
  • US12578485B2 patent drawing
  • US12578485B2 patent drawing
  • US12578485B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a method for measuring and checking the irradiation of a product by a radiation source using a measuring device. After conveying the product in front of the radiation source, the radiation beam irradiates the front of the product and passes through to hit the at least two detectors, which are pointing to the same target zone of the radiation source by a collimator. Finally, the recorded signal of each detector is compared with the signals determined in the performance qualification.