Radiographic Collimator with Unequal Interval Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high manufacturing cost and weight of collimators in radiographic diagnosis apparatuses, particularly X-ray CT systems, due to the use of heavy metals like molybdenum and tungsten for absorbing scattered X-rays, necessitate a more efficient and cost-effective solution.

Innovation Solution

A collimator design with absorption walls arranged at unequal intervals along the X-ray incident direction, using reduced amounts of heavy metals, and potentially alternating materials or varying thicknesses to enhance absorption rates, while maintaining effective scattered X-ray removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If heavy metals such as Mo and W are used in large quantities as the material of the absorption walls constituting the collimator, then the scattered X-ray absorption capability is improved, but the manufacturing cost and weight of the collimator are greatly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered X-ray absorption capabilityVSAvoidcollimator weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The absorption wall is divided into multiple absorption portions arranged at unequal intervals along the X-ray incident direction. This segmentation allows the collimator to maintain scattered X-ray absorption capability while using less heavy metal material, thereby reducing weight and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the absorption wall have different absorption portion arrangements. The absorption portions are arranged at unequal intervals, with denser arrangements in regions requiring higher absorption and sparser arrangements in regions where less absorption is needed. This local optimization reduces overall material usage while maintaining necessary absorption performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If heavy metals such as Mo and W are used in large quantities as the material of the absorption walls constituting the collimator, then the scattered X-ray absorption capability is improved, but the manufacturing cost is greatly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered X-ray absorption capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The absorption wall is segmented into multiple absorption portions with gaps between them. This reduces the total volume of expensive heavy metal materials (Mo and W) required, directly lowering manufacturing cost while maintaining sufficient scattered X-ray absorption through strategic positioning of the absorption portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The absorption portions are arranged at unequal intervals to optimize material distribution. Regions with higher scattered X-ray flux receive denser absorption portions, while other regions use sparser arrangements, minimizing overall heavy metal usage and associated costs while preserving absorption effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If absorption portions are arranged at unequal intervals along the incident direction, then the material usage is reduced, but the design complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy metal material usageVSAvoidcollimator design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The absorption portions are arranged at unequal intervals with specific patterns that optimize material reduction. While the intervals vary, the arrangement follows systematic design rules that balance complexity reduction with material efficiency, placing absorption portions where they provide maximum scattering radiation attenuation per unit material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the manufacturing cost and weight of the collimator while maintaining its ability to remove scattered X-rays, improving the overall efficiency and reducing material usage by about 10% compared to conventional collimators.

Implementation Method 1

The collimator removes scattered X-rays that are made incident on the X-ray detector, by absorbing scattered ray components contained in the incident X-ray to the X-ray detector, i.e., by absorbing scattered X-rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS10722196B2Radiographic diagnosis apparatus, radiation detector and collimator
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US10722196B2 patent drawing
  • US10722196B2 patent drawing
  • US10722196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiographic diagnosis apparatus according to a present embodiment includes: an X-ray source configured to generate an X-ray; an X-ray detector configured to detect the X-ray and to generate an electric signal according to the X-ray; and a collimator provided on an X-ray incident side of the X-ray detector and the collimator including an absorption wall configured to absorb a scattered X-ray. The absorption wall includes absorption portions arranged along an incident direction of the X-ray. The absorption portions are arranged at unequal intervals along the incident direction.