Collision Assessment Using Telematics Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating vehicle collisions rely heavily on witness testimony, which is prone to fraud and subjectivity, and require costly and time-consuming analysis of recorded data, making liability determination and repair estimates inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that analyze telematics data, including GPS, accelerometer, and gyroscope data, to determine collision severity, impact areas, and associated events, enabling objective assessment of liability and repair costs without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If recorded data from EDRs, telematics devices, or dashcams is used to evaluate collisions, then objectivity and reliability of collision assessment is improved, but the complexity of data analysis and interpretation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of collision assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A server acts as an intermediary between the collision data sources (EDRs, telematics devices, dashcams) and the entities needing collision assessment. The server automatically receives, processes, and analyzes the raw collision data, extracting key information such as collision severity, impact location, and liability indicators. This intermediary system eliminates the need for manual data analysis while maintaining high reliability through automated objective assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of trained operatives analyzing collision data is replaced with an automated electronic system. The server uses algorithms to process telematics data, accelerometer readings, and other collision parameters automatically, substituting human analysis with machine-based computation that is both faster and equally or more reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual analysis of collision data by trained operatives is performed, then accurate interpretation of collision circumstances is achieved, but the time and cost required for liability determination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of collision interpretationVSAvoidtime for liability determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Telematics data and collision information are automatically recorded and transmitted to the server in advance, before any analysis is needed. The system performs preliminary processing of the data, organizing it into structured formats that facilitate rapid automated assessment. This preliminary action ensures that when a collision occurs, the data is already prepared for immediate analysis, eliminating delays associated with data collection and initial processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The collision assessment system is self-service in that it automatically receives, processes, and analyzes collision data without requiring manual intervention. The server independently evaluates collision severity, determines impact locations, and generates liability assessments autonomously, freeing operatives from manual analysis tasks while maintaining high accuracy through sophisticated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If detailed inspection by loss adjusters is conducted to determine repair costs, then accuracy of damage assessment is improved, but the cost and time of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of damage assessmentVSAvoidefficiency of repair determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual inspection process conducted by loss adjusters is replaced with automated analysis of telematics data. The server uses accelerometer data, collision force measurements, and impact location information to calculate damage assessments automatically. This electronic substitution of mechanical inspection maintains accuracy by using objective physical measurements while dramatically improving productivity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of physically inspecting vehicles, the system creates a digital copy or model of the collision event using telematics data. This digital representation includes force vectors, impact locations, and acceleration profiles that accurately replicate the physical damage scenario, allowing virtual assessment that is both accurate and efficient without requiring physical vehicle inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3711032B1Collision evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 XTRACT360 LTD
  • EP3711032B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3711032B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3711032B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A collision is analysed by receiving telematics data relating to a collision and determining a feature of the collision. An entity may be notified of said collision based on the determined features.