Vehicle Collision Avoidance System Blind Spot Warning Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern collision avoidance systems in vehicles generate unnecessary warnings and controls in situations where actual collisions are unlikely, causing distractions and reducing operator satisfaction and performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that suppresses or adjusts warnings and controls based on vehicle speed, trajectory, and blind spot considerations to minimize distractions by identifying potential collisions that are unlikely to occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the collision avoidance system generates warnings and control signals for all detected potential collisions, then the system provides comprehensive safety coverage, but the operator experiences increased distractions and reduced satisfaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidoperator distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters related to warning generation by evaluating additional contextual factors (vehicle speed, trajectory, blind spot location, object type) before generating warnings. This filters out false alarms while maintaining safety coverage for genuine threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from multiple sensors (collision sensors, speed sensors, trajectory data) to continuously evaluate the validity of detected objects and adjust warning generation accordingly, reducing false positives while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system continuously monitors and warns of potential collisions in narrow city streets with many objects, then the system maintains high safety awareness, but the operator's ability to properly operate the vehicle is negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety awarenessVSAvoidoperator performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system modifies its warning generation parameters by incorporating vehicle speed, trajectory, and blind spot analysis to distinguish between transient objects (like pedestrians crossing briefly) and genuine collision threats, reducing unnecessary warnings that hinder operator performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different evaluation criteria to different spatial zones around the vehicle, particularly considering blind spot regions and areas where frequent transient objects are expected, thereby reducing false alarms in specific locations while maintaining vigilance in critical zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the collision avoidance system generates warnings for brief steering changes that introduce objects into the path, then the system provides continuous protection, but the operator experiences unwanted distractions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous protectionVSAvoidunwanted distractions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of detected objects by analyzing vehicle speed, trajectory, and the nature of the detected object before generating warnings. This preliminary action filters out transient situations (like brief steering adjustments) that would trigger false alarms while maintaining protection against genuine threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters for warning generation by requiring multiple conditions to be met simultaneously (object detection, low vehicle speed, specific trajectory conditions, object in blind spot region) before issuing a warning, thereby reducing distractions from normal driving maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250313194A1System and Method for Suppression or Adjustment of Actions by a Vehicle Collision Avoidance System
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC
  • US20250313194A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313194A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle collision avoidance system includes a collision sensor that generates a collision signal indicative of an object in a path of travel of the vehicle. A controller identifies a first side of the vehicle containing a blind spot for an operator of the vehicle. The controller further identifies a potential collision between the vehicle and the object responsive to the collision sensor and the speed of the vehicle and the trajectory of the vehicle. The controller suppresses, or adjusts one or more conditions for, generation of a control signal relating to the potential collision if the vehicle speed and trajectory meet predetermined conditions and the potential collision would occur on a second side of the vehicle opposite the first side of the vehicle.