Collision Avoidance Sensing with Weighted Multi-Zone Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional collision avoidance systems (CAS) face challenges in accurately determining the speed or distance of approaching objects due to interference from environmental noise, and either radar-based systems suffer from misjudgment or image recognition systems struggle with precision.

Innovation Solution

A combined radar and image recognition system for a carrier that includes a processor to detect objects in multiple areas, calculate collision probabilities based on weights and lighting states, and output alarm messages when thresholds are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If radar technology is used for detecting objects, then the detection range is extended, but misjudgment occurs due to environmental noise interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines radar detection with image recognition technology to create a hybrid system. The radar provides detection range while the image recognition module validates targets to eliminate false positives from environmental noise, thus maintaining both extended detection range and high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The image recognition module acts as an intermediary between the radar detection and the collision probability calculation. It validates radar-detected objects by analyzing visual characteristics, filtering out noise-induced false detections before they affect the final collision assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If image recognition technology is used for detecting objects, then the visual identification is improved, but the determination of speed or distance becomes inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual identification accuracyVSAvoidspeed and distance measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges image recognition with radar measurement capabilities. The image recognition module provides accurate visual identification while the radar component simultaneously provides precise speed and distance measurements, combining the strengths of both technologies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If a single detection area is used, then the system complexity is reduced, but the collision probability calculation lacks precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection area structureVSAvoidcollision probability calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection space into multiple concentric detection areas (first detection area, second detection area, third detection area) with different weights. This segmentation allows the system to assign different collision probabilities to objects at different distances, significantly improving calculation accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured zonation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12466426B2Collision avoidance system and collision avoidance method
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 WISTRON CORP
  • US12466426B2 patent drawing
  • US12466426B2 patent drawing
  • US12466426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A CAS and a collision avoidance method are provided. The collision avoidance method includes: detecting, by a radar, a first detection area and a second detection area to generate a detection result of a target object, where the second detection area includes the first detection area and is greater than the first detection area; determining whether the target object invades the first detection area or the second detection area based on the detection result; in response to determining that the target object invades the second detection area but does not invade the first detection area, calculating a first collision probability based on a first weight and the detection result; in response to determining that the target object invades the first detection area, calculating the first collision probability based on a second weight and the detection result; determining whether to output an alarm message based on the first collision probability.