Collision Avoidance Timing Based on Driver Self-Avoidance Probability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle collision avoidance assist systems face challenges in determining the optimal timing for initiating collision avoidance controls without causing driver discomfort, as starting too early can lead to unnecessary interventions and starting too late may result in collisions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle collision avoidance assist apparatus that uses an electronic control unit to assess the driver's collision self-avoidance probability based on grasping state, consciousness state, and steering wheel interaction to adjust the timing of collision avoidance controls, initiating them earlier when the driver's probability of avoiding a collision is low and later when it is high.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the collision avoidance control is started at an early timing, then the collision of the own vehicle with the forward object can be surely avoided, but the driver may feel discomfort due to unnecessary intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance reliabilityVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the start timing parameter of collision avoidance control based on the driver's state. When the driver is determined to be in a state with low collision self-avoidance probability (e.g., drowsy, distracted), the control starts earlier to ensure safety. When the driver is in a normal state with high self-avoidance probability, the control starts later to avoid unnecessary intervention and maintain driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The start timing of collision avoidance control is made dynamic rather than fixed. The electronic control unit continuously monitors the driver's state and adjusts the control start timing in real-time based on the assessed collision self-avoidance probability, allowing the system to adapt between early intervention and late intervention scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the collision avoidance control is started at a late timing, then driver discomfort is minimized, but the collision may not be avoided even when control is executed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver comfortVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts the start timing parameter dynamically based on driver assessment. When the driver shows signs of reduced awareness or capability (low collision self-avoidance probability), the system advances the control start timing to ensure sufficient response time for avoidance, preventing collisions that would occur with late timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of the driver's collision self-avoidance probability before determining the optimal start timing. By evaluating the driver's state in advance (through monitoring steering operations, eye movements, or other indicators), the system can prepare appropriate control timing that ensures safety while minimizing unnecessary intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the collision avoidance control start timing is fixed, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to different driver states and situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoiddriver state adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control unit performs self-assessment of the driver's collision self-avoidance probability by monitoring the driver's own operations and states. This self-service capability allows the system to automatically adapt control timing to different driver states without requiring complex external assessment devices or manual input, maintaining relative system simplicity while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring driver behavior (steering wheel operations, pedal operations, eye tracking) and using this information to assess collision self-avoidance probability. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt the collision avoidance control start timing to match the current driver state, improving both safety and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12097846B2Vehicle collision avoidance assist apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12097846B2 patent drawing
  • US12097846B2 patent drawing
  • US12097846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle collision avoidance assist apparatus executes a collision avoidance control for avoiding a collision of an own vehicle with an object ahead of the own vehicle. The apparatus determines whether a driver of the own vehicle has a collision self-avoidance probability that the driver can avoid the collision of the own vehicle with the object ahead of the own vehicle by carrying out a driving operation to the own vehicle. When the apparatus determines that the driver does not have the collision self-avoidance probability, the apparatus sets a start timing of starting executing the collision avoidance control to a timing earlier than the start timing set when the apparatus determines that the driver has the collision self-avoidance probability.