Collision Reconstruction Engine for Faster Claim Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SaaS providers face inefficiencies in claim processing, particularly in insurance claims, due to time-consuming manual procedures and suboptimal use of computational resources, leading to frustration for policy holders and delays for providers.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that optimizes claim processes using artificial intelligence and machine learning to streamline information gathering, automate negotiations, and reduce processing time by leveraging large language models (LLMs) and real-time communications with users and call center representatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual procedures are used for claim processing, then processing accuracy can be maintained through human judgment, but processing time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing accuracyVSAvoidclaim processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical claim processing with an automated computing system that uses machine learning models, large language models, and computer vision algorithms to process claims, extract information from images and documents, and generate assessments automatically, thereby eliminating the trade-off between human judgment accuracy and processing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces AI intermediaries including machine learning models, large language models, and computer vision systems that act as mediators between claim data and processing decisions, enabling automated accurate assessment without requiring direct human intervention for each claim while maintaining high processing standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional claim processing methods are used, then system complexity remains manageable, but resource utilization is suboptimal and processing delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the claim processing system into specialized modular components including document processing modules, image analysis modules, machine learning inference modules, and communication modules, each handling specific tasks independently, which manages overall system complexity while enabling parallel processing and high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal computing system that can handle multiple types of claims, various document formats, different image types, and diverse communication channels through a single integrated platform using AI models that adapt to different processing needs, thereby improving resource utilization and productivity without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive information gathering is performed manually, then data accuracy improves, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidinformation gathering time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual information gathering with automated AI systems including large language models that extract and verify data from documents, computer vision systems that analyze images, and machine learning models that assess claims, achieving comprehensive accurate data collection instantaneously without manual time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous automated information gathering where AI systems continuously process documents, analyze images, verify data, and update claim assessments in real-time throughout the claims lifecycle, eliminating gaps and delays associated with manual periodic reviews while maintaining data accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260050716A1Collision reconstruction engine
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ASSURED INSURANCE TECH INC
  • US20260050716A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050716A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050716A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include a computing system, computing device, computer-implemented method, and non-transitory computer readable for a collision reconstruction engine. Embodiments provide for obtaining an information corpus corresponding to a vehicle incident involving a vehicle over one or more sessions with a user. Based on the information corpus, embodiments generate a vehicle incident simulation of the vehicle incident.