Collision Warning System for Autonomous Vehicle Safety Operators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Safety operators of autonomous driving vehicles face challenges in maintaining focus and awareness of potential collisions, as they cannot constantly monitor the vehicle's surroundings while it operates in autonomous mode.

Innovation Solution

A collision warning system that uses sensors and networked communication to detect obstacles and calculate the time to collision, generating a warning signal if the time to collision is below a threshold or consistently decreasing, alerting the safety operator through a user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the autonomous vehicle operates in autonomous mode with minimal human interaction, then the vehicle can navigate to various locations using onboard sensors, but the safety operator cannot constantly monitor the vehicle's surroundings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous navigation capabilityVSAvoidsafety operator awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism by continuously calculating time to collision (TTC) based on sensor data and planned trajectory, then providing warning signals to the safety operator when collision risk is detected. This closed-loop feedback ensures the operator is informed of potential dangers without requiring constant active monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The collision warning system acts as an intermediary between the autonomous driving system and the safety operator. It processes sensor data and trajectory information automatically, then communicates critical collision risk information to the operator, bridging the gap between autonomous operation and human oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the safety operator takes over automated driving systems when there is a clear danger of collision, then traffic accidents can be prevented, but it is hard for the safety operator to be focused at all times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention capabilityVSAvoidoperator focus maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating time to collision continuously in advance and issuing warning signals before actual collision danger occurs. This allows the safety operator to be alerted proactively and take preventive action rather than reacting to immediate threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle system performs self-service by automatically monitoring its own trajectory, detecting obstacles, calculating collision risk, and generating warning signals without requiring continuous human intervention. This automates the safety monitoring function while keeping the operator available when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system generates a warning signal when time to collision is less than a threshold or consistently decreasing, then the safety operator is alerted to potential collisions, but the system requires continuous monitoring and calculation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision warning accuracyVSAvoidcontinuous monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical collision risk information from the full set of sensor data and trajectory parameters. By focusing specifically on time to collision calculation and comparing it against thresholds, the system filters out unnecessary data processing while maintaining high warning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in the time to collision parameter over time. By detecting when TTC becomes less than a threshold or consistently decreases across multiple planning cycles, the system identifies collision risk through parameter change detection rather than requiring complex pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11491976B2Collision warning system for safety operators of autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 BAIDU USA LLC
  • US11491976B2 patent drawing
  • US11491976B2 patent drawing
  • US11491976B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclose a system and method to send an alert/warning for a potential collision to a safety operator of an autonomous driving vehicle (ADV). According to one embodiment, a system perceives an environment of an autonomous driving vehicle (ADV), including one or more obstacles. The system determines whether the ADV will potentially collide with the one or more obstacles based on a planned trajectory. If the ADV is determined to potentially collide, the system determines a time to collision based on the planned trajectory and the one or more obstacles. If the determined time to collision is less than a threshold or the time to collision decreases for a predetermined number of consecutive planning cycles, the system generates a warning signal to alert an operator of the ADV. The system sends the warning signal to an operator interface of the ADV to alert the operator of the potential collision.