Collision Warning False Event Suppression via GPS Memory

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision warning systems (CWS) often generate false positives, which can be distracting for drivers, as they fail to differentiate between actual collision threats and non-threatening objects, such as metal plates in the road, leading to unnecessary alarms.

Innovation Solution

A collision warning apparatus and method that utilizes sensors, GPS, and persistent memory to identify potential collision objects by comparing current GPS coordinates with stored data, suppressing warnings for repeatedly detected objects at the same location, thereby reducing false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If collision detection algorithms and sensing systems are refined to improve detection accuracy, then the system can better identify actual collision threats, but false positives still occur due to non-threatening objects like metal plates in the road

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing GPS coordinates of previously detected objects in persistent memory before encountering them again. When the same object is detected, the system compares current GPS coordinates with stored coordinates to identify it as a previously seen object, suppressing false collision warnings before they can be generated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing current sensor detections with historical data stored in persistent memory. The GPS coordinates of previously identified objects are fed back into the system, allowing the processor to recognize patterns and differentiate between actual threats and recurring non-threatening objects like road plates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system issues warnings for all detected potential collision objects, then no actual collision threats are missed, but driver distraction increases due to unnecessary alarms from non-threatening objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision warning coverageVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing GPS coordinates of previously detected objects in persistent memory. When the same object is detected again, the system compares current coordinates with stored coordinates and suppresses warnings for recognized non-threatening objects, preventing driver distraction before it occurs while maintaining comprehensive threat coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism using persistent memory to store and retrieve historical object location data. This intermediary layer acts as a filter between sensor detection and warning output, allowing the system to distinguish between actual threats requiring driver attention and non-threatening objects that should be ignored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system stores and processes historical GPS coordinate data to reduce false positives, then false event suppression improves, but device complexity increases due to additional memory and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive suppressionVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing GPS coordinates of previously detected objects in persistent memory during normal operation. This historical data is prepared in advance, allowing rapid comparison and false positive suppression without requiring complex real-time analysis, thereby minimizing additional system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by storing simplified representations of object locations (GPS coordinates) in persistent memory rather than maintaining complex object models. This copying approach reduces false positives through coordinate comparison while keeping the additional data structure simple and the processing overhead minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8370056B2False event suppression for collision avoidance systems
Publication Date: 2013.02.05 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8370056B2 patent drawing
  • US8370056B2 patent drawing
  • US8370056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision warning apparatus includes sensors, output devices, memory locations, a GPS device, and a processor. The processor may receive information from the sensors. The processor may also process the information to identify a detected object as a present potential collision object. The processor may compare present GPS coordinates of the vehicle with stored vehicle GPS coordinates saved in memory, to determine whether or not the present GPS coordinates correspond to stored vehicle GPS coordinates associated with a previously identified potential collision object. If the present GPS coordinates correspond to stored vehicle GPS coordinates associated with a previously identified potential collision object, the processor is operable to suppress a potential collision warning.