Colonoscopy Navigation Map Interface for Complete Coverage Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional endoscopy interfaces fail to provide adequate visualization tools for ensuring complete coverage of the colon during procedures, leading to missed polyps due to small size or flat shape, or incomplete examination areas.

Innovation Solution

A colonoscopy user-interface that includes a navigational map, position marker, cross-sectional coverage map, and guidance arrows, along with real-time polyp detection and optical biopsy feedback, to guide the endoscopist to ensure thorough examination of the colon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional endoscopy interfaces are used, then the system remains simple and easy to operate, but polyp detection reliability deteriorates due to missed polyps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolyp detection reliabilityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into distinct functional modules: a navigational map showing longitudinal sections of the colon, a cross-sectional coverage map displaying angular portions, a position marker indicating current scope location, and polyp detection overlays. Each module independently contributes to overall detection reliability without requiring complete redesign of the entire interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single two-dimensional video feed to a multi-dimensional visualization system that includes longitudinal mapping (navigational map), angular/cross-sectional mapping (coverage map), and spatial positioning (position marker). This dimensional expansion provides comprehensive coverage visualization without overwhelming the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If comprehensive coverage visualization is implemented, then polyp detection completeness improves, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage completenessVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary mapping of the colon's longitudinal sections and cross-sectional angles during the insertion phase, establishing a complete spatial framework before the withdrawal phase begins. This pre-established framework enables real-time coverage tracking without requiring complex on-the-fly calculations during the critical withdrawal inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The interface provides continuous feedback through the position marker on the navigational map and the coverage indicators on the cross-sectional map, showing the endoscopist exactly which areas have been inspected and which remain. This real-time feedback loop enables self-correcting behavior where the operator can immediately address uncovered areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time coverage tracking is provided, then missed polyps are reduced, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolyp detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified two-dimensional copies (maps) of the three-dimensional colon anatomy, representing longitudinal sections and cross-sectional angles. These map copies are computationally lightweight compared to full 3D reconstruction while providing sufficient information for coverage tracking and navigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If multiple visualization elements are displayed, then navigation and coverage monitoring improve, but ease of operation deteriorates due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the display are allocated to different functional purposes: the navigational map provides global longitudinal context, the cross-sectional coverage map shows local angular coverage at the current position, the position marker indicates immediate location, and polyp overlays highlight specific findings. Each region has optimized visual characteristics for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple two-dimensional maps (longitudinal navigational map and cross-sectional coverage map) to represent three-dimensional spatial information, avoiding the need for complex 3D visualization while providing comprehensive spatial awareness through dimensional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4094674B1User-interface for visualization of endoscopy procedures
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 VERILY LIFE SCIENCES LLC
  • EP4094674B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4094674B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4094674B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A user-interface for visualizing a colonoscopy procedure includes a video region and a navigational map upon which coverage annotations are displayed. A live video feed received from a colonoscope is displayed in the video region. The navigational map depicts longitudinal sections of a colon. The coverage annotations are presented on the navigation map and indicate whether one or more of the longitudinal sections is deemed adequately inspected or inadequately inspected during the colonoscopy procedure.