Column Base Fitting Corner Built-Up Portions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional column base structures face challenges in increasing flexural capacity without escalating size, weight, and cost, particularly due to the uneven distribution of bending moments across the bottom plate, which leads to potential yield in corner portions.

Innovation Solution

The column base fitting features a design with strategically positioned bolt insertion holes and corner built-up portions that equalize the distance from the center of the holes to the corner built-up portions, reducing the thickness of the bottom plate while enhancing rigidity, thereby distributing stress evenly and preventing excessive size and weight increases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of the bottom plate is increased to enhance flexural capacity, then the strength and rigidity are improved, but the size, weight, and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexural capacityVSAvoidweight of column base fitting
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by forming built-up portions at specific corner regions of the bottom plate where bending moments are highest. These built-up portions locally increase thickness and strength only where needed to resist bending forces, rather than uniformly increasing the entire plate thickness. This resolves the contradiction by providing enhanced flexural capacity at critical locations while maintaining reduced overall weight and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a two-dimensional uniform plate to a three-dimensional structure with varying thickness. By creating built-up portions that protrude upward from the bottom plate surface, the design adds vertical dimensionality to address bending moment requirements. This allows the structure to achieve necessary flexural capacity through localized vertical expansion rather than uniform horizontal expansion, reducing overall weight while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the thickness of the bottom plate is increased to withstand bending moment, then the rigidity is improved, but the size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidsize of column base fitting
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The built-up portions are strategically positioned at corner regions where bending moments are maximum, providing localized rigidity enhancement. This approach maintains overall compact size while achieving necessary rigidity at critical stress points, avoiding the need to increase the entire plate dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom plate is segmented into regions of different thicknesses - the built-up portions at corners have greater thickness for rigidity, while the central and edge regions maintain thinner profiles. This segmentation allows the structure to achieve overall rigidity through strategic reinforcement rather than uniform thickening, controlling total size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the distance from bolt insertion hole center to support base lower end is increased, then the anchorage is improved, but the bending moment increases requiring greater thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchorage reliabilityVSAvoidbending resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The built-up portions are positioned to locally increase the effective distance from bolt insertion holes to the lower end of the support base at corner regions. This localized extension improves anchorage reliability and simultaneously provides the additional thickness needed to resist the resulting bending moments, resolving the contradiction between anchorage improvement and bending resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9353544B2Column base fitting and column base structure using it
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 SENQCIA CO LTD
  • US9353544B2 patent drawing
  • US9353544B2 patent drawing
  • US9353544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A column base fitting 42 includes a bottom plate 42c having an approximately square plate shape and a support base 42f inside from the peripheral part of an upper surface 42d of the bottom plate 42c. A first bolt insertion holes 42a is formed in each four corner portions of the bottom plate 42c and a second bolt insertion hole 42b is formed at two positions closer to the center part than the first bolt insertion hole 42a, in the length direction of each four sides of the bottom plate 42c. A corner built-up portion 42r is formed at both ends in the length direction of the side surface 42h of the support base 42f, having a shape protruding outward in the perpendicular direction from the side surface 42h and filling the corner portion between the side surface 42h and an upper surface of the bottom plate 42c.