Columnar Scintillator Bright Burn Suppression via Divalent Cations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radiation detection apparatuses face the issue of 'bright burn,' where characteristics of scintillators change after irradiation, leading to reduced luminance and image quality due to carrier trapping at trap levels, causing afterimages and artifacts in continuous radiography.

Innovation Solution

A scintillator with a columnar crystal structure containing an alkali halide metal compound as a host material and a precious metal compound as an additive with a lower ionization tendency and melting point than hydrogen, which couples with trap levels to prevent carrier trapping, thereby reducing bright burn and improving crystallinity and light transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If atoms as monovalent cations are added to suppress bright burn, then bright burn is suppressed, but crystallinity deteriorates and light transmission efficiency reduces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebright burn suppressionVSAvoidcrystallinity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by introducing divalent cation atoms (such as Ba, Sr, Ca) instead of monovalent cations, and controls their concentration within specific ranges (0.01-5 at%). This parameter adjustment suppresses bright burn while maintaining crystallinity, resolving the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite scintillator material combining alkali halide host material with divalent cation additives. This composite structure leverages the beneficial effects of divalent cations (bright burn suppression) while avoiding the harmful effects (crystallinity deterioration) associated with monovalent cations, thus resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If atoms as monovalent cations are added to suppress bright burn, then bright burn is suppressed, but light transmission efficiency reduces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebright burn suppressionVSAvoidlight transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the additive type from monovalent to divalent cations and optimizes concentration parameters, which suppresses bright burn mechanisms while maintaining optical transparency. This resolves the contradiction between reliability (bright burn suppression) and energy efficiency (light transmission).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses small concentrations of divalent cation atoms as sacrificial elements that preferentially trap carriers to prevent bright burn, while their low concentration ensures they don't significantly scatter or absorb light, thus maintaining high transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If carrier trapping at trap levels occurs, then bright burn happens, but afterimages and artifacts occur reducing image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebright burn suppressionVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces divalent cation atoms as intermediary elements that act as carrier traps with appropriate energy levels. These intermediaries capture carriers that would otherwise be trapped at deep trap levels causing bright burn and afterimages, thereby improving both reliability and measurement precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses bright burn, maintaining high scintillator quality and image clarity by ensuring proper recombination of carriers, reducing afterimages and artifacts, and enhancing the S/N ratio of photoelectric conversion elements.

Implementation Method 1

Some radiation detection apparatuses (or radiation imaging apparatuses) are configured to convert radiation into light using a scintillator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

detect the light using photoelectric conversion elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric conversion: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

a scintillator having a columnar crystal structure vapor-deposited on a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS11073626B2Scintillator, method of forming the same, and radiation detection apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.07.27 CANON KK
  • US11073626B2 patent drawing
  • US11073626B2 patent drawing
  • US11073626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A scintillator having a columnar crystal structure vapor-deposited on a substrate, wherein each column of the crystal structure contains an alkali halide metal compound as a host material, and further contains, as an additive, a compound of a precious metal as a metal having lower ionization tendency than hydrogen (H), with the additive having a lower melting point than the host material.