Co-Manipulation Robot Arm for Stable Laparoscopic Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laparoscopic surgical systems face challenges in managing vision and access, with complex robot-assisted systems being expensive, space-consuming, and requiring unique instruments, while manual solutions are impractical and require extensive manual interaction.

Innovation Solution

A co-manipulation surgical system with a robot arm that can seamlessly position and manipulate surgical instruments, featuring a controller that switches between passive, co-manipulation, and haptic modes, and includes a base that allows for rotational movement and impedance control, along with optical scanning for instrument identification and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If complex robot-assisted systems are used to enhance laparoscopic surgical procedures, then surgical precision and control are improved, but system cost and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: a robot arm for positioning, a controller for coordination, and impedance control mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall surgical precision without requiring a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot arm incorporates dynamic impedance control that adjusts mechanical impedance in real-time based on surgical needs. This allows the system to transition between compliant and rigid states, providing surgical precision when needed while maintaining ease of manipulation otherwise, thereby reducing the need for permanently complex system configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If rail-mounted orthopedic retractors are used to hold surgical instruments in position, then instrument positioning stability is improved, but manual interaction requirements and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument positioning stabilityVSAvoidtime for unlocking and repositioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arm with impedance control serves itself by automatically adjusting instrument positions and maintaining stability without requiring manual unlocking or repositioning. The system self-regulates its mechanical impedance to maintain stable positioning while allowing easy repositioning through controlled impedance adjustment, eliminating the time-consuming manual operations required by rail-mounted systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If unique system-specific surgical instruments are used with robot-assisted systems, then compatibility and control are improved, but adaptability and ease of operation with standard instruments decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument compatibilityVSAvoidsurgeon learning curve
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robot arm is designed with a universal coupling mechanism that can accommodate both standard off-the-shelf surgical instruments and specialized instruments. The impedance control system adapts its parameters based on the attached instrument type, providing consistent ease of operation across different instrument configurations without requiring surgeons to learn system-specific techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If assistants manually hold retractor and laparoscope devices, then vision and access management are improved, but operational impracticality and assistant coordination complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevision and access managementVSAvoidassistant coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the functions of multiple assistants into a single automated robot arm that can simultaneously manage retraction, visualization, and instrument positioning. The unified control system coordinates these functions through integrated impedance control, eliminating the complexity of coordinating multiple human assistants while maintaining ease of vision and access management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4312857B1Co-manipulation surgical system for use with surgical instruments for performing laparoscopic surgery
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 MOON SURGICAL SAS
  • EP4312857B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4312857B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4312857B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Co-manipulation robotic systems are described herein that may be used for assisting with laparoscopic surgical procedures. The co-manipulation robotic systems allow a surgeon to use commercially-available surgical tools while providing benefits associated with surgical robotics. Advantageously, the surgical tools may be seamlessly coupled to the robot arms using a disposable coupler while the reusable portions of the robot arm remain in a sterile drape. Further, the co-manipulation robotic system may operate in multiple modes to enhance usability and safety, while allowing the surgeon to position the instrument directly with the instrument handle and further maintain the desired position of the instrument using the robot arm.