Comb-Tooth Crack Evaluation for Additively Manufactured Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating crack sensitivity in additively manufactured objects, such as those produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), are time-consuming and lack quantitative assessment, particularly for compositions less prone to cracking.

Innovation Solution

A crack evaluation method and device that utilizes a specially designed additively manufactured object with a body, base, connecting, and comb tooth parts, including a stress concentration notch, to quantify crack sensitivity by counting cracked comb teeth, allowing for composition and manufacturing condition optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional cross-section cutting and polishing methods are used to evaluate cracking, then evaluation can be performed, but the evaluation process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a preliminary action by adding a notch to the manufactured object before the additive manufacturing process. This notch serves as a stress concentration point that pre-determines where cracks will form, eliminating the need for post-manufacturing cross-section cutting and polishing to locate cracks. The crack evaluation can be performed directly on the surface, dramatically reducing evaluation time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If visual inspection is used to evaluate crack patterns, then simple evaluation is possible, but quantitative evaluation of crack sensitivity is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidcrack sensitivity quantification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process by dividing the crack evaluation device into multiple comb teeth, where each tooth represents an independent evaluation unit. By counting the number of cracked comb teeth rather than attempting to measure continuous crack patterns, the method achieves quantitative crack sensitivity evaluation while maintaining the simplicity of visual inspection. This segmentation transforms a qualitative visual assessment into a quantitative countable metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If notch is added to make object more prone to cracking for simple evaluation, then evaluation becomes simpler, but cannot evaluate compositions less prone to cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidapplicability to different material compositions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from evaluating crack patterns in two dimensions (surface visual inspection) to evaluating crack distribution across multiple discrete comb teeth elements. This dimensional change allows the method to detect even subtle cracking in materials less prone to cracking by counting individual tooth failures, thereby expanding applicability to diverse material compositions while maintaining evaluation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quantitative evaluation of crack sensitivity, facilitating the selection of compositions and conditions that reduce cracking, even for materials less prone to thermal stress cracking.

Implementation Method 1

in a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) method involving repeatedly spreading a powder and selectively melting and solidifying the powder by laser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser melting: Laser

Implementation Method 2

since the power is melted by laser and rapidly cooled and solidified to form a shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid cooling and solidification: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

thermal contraction during post-manufacturing cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 4

tensile stress tends to act on the manufactured object and cause cracking due to solidification shrinkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification shrinkage: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP4509248B1Crack evaluation method of additively manufactured object and crack evaluation device
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 PROTERIAL LTD
  • EP4509248B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4509248B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4509248B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A crack evaluation method of an additively manufactured object, which is a method evaluating a crack sensitivity of an additively manufactured object, includes the following. A crack evaluation device (10) is additively manufactured using a raw material powder. The crack evaluation device (10) includes: a body part (1), a base part (2) opposed to the body part (1), a connecting part (3) connecting one end side of the body part (1) and the base part (2), a stress concentration part (9) connecting another end side of the body part (1) and the base part (2), and a comb tooth part (4) connecting, by comb teeth (40), the body part (1) and the base part (2) between the connecting part (3) and the stress concentration part (9) . The crack sensitivity is evaluated based on cracked comb teeth at the crack evaluation device serving as the additively manufactured object.