Combinatorial ALD and PVD for High-k Gate Stack Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high productivity combinatorial (HPC) processing techniques have not been successfully adapted to evaluate materials and process conditions for optimal high-k gate stack characteristics, particularly for effective work function, in semiconductor devices.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of combinatorial atomic layer deposition (ALD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) processes, along with additional support processes like cleaning and lithography patterning, to deposit multiple layers in site-isolated regions, allowing for the screening of layer properties and the development of ALD processes that achieve desired characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional separate substrate testing is used for different materials and process conditions, then each material/condition can be tested individually, but the number of substrates required increases significantly and development costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidnumber of substrates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into multiple site-isolated regions, each receiving different processing conditions or materials. This segmentation allows parallel testing of multiple variables on a single substrate, reducing the total number of substrates needed while maintaining evaluation accuracy for each condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple testing functions are merged onto a single substrate by creating site-isolated regions that can be processed independently. This combining approach allows simultaneous evaluation of different materials, process conditions, and sequences on one substrate, dramatically reducing substrate consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple substrates are used to test different process sequences and integrations, then comprehensive evaluation is possible, but processing time and development costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess evaluation capabilityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate surface is segmented into multiple site-isolated regions that can independently accommodate different process sequences and integration flows. This enables parallel processing and evaluation of multiple process variations simultaneously, reducing development time while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation approach transitions from testing multiple substrates sequentially to testing multiple regions on a single substrate in parallel. This dimensional change from substrate-level to region-level testing enables simultaneous evaluation of multiple process sequences, dramatically accelerating development timelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional processing techniques are used for high-k gate dielectrics, then standard processes can be applied, but the sensitivity of high-k dielectrics to process conditions requires precise control and sequencing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidprocess control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different site-isolated regions on the substrate receive different processing conditions, materials, and sequences tailored to specific evaluation needs. This local quality approach allows precise control of process variables in each region while maintaining overall process simplicity through standardized processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention systematically varies processing parameters such as material composition, deposition conditions, and process sequencing across different site-isolated regions. This parameter change strategy enables precise evaluation of high-k dielectric sensitivity to process conditions while maintaining manageable process complexity through controlled variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the efficient evaluation and optimization of materials and processes for high-k device performance, reducing the need for multiple substrates and lowering development costs by allowing for the screening of various materials and conditions on a single monolithic substrate.

Implementation Method 1

combinatorial atomic layer deposition (ALD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomic layer deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

combinatorial atomic layer deposition (ALD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS9040465B2Dielectric doping using high productivity combinatorial methods
Publication Date: 2015.05.26 INTERMOLECULAR INC
  • US9040465B2 patent drawing
  • US9040465B2 patent drawing
  • US9040465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combination of deposition processes can be used to evaluate layer properties using a combinatorial workflow. The processes can include a base ALD process and another process, such as a PVD process. The high productivity combinatorial technique can provide an evaluation of the material properties for given ALD base layer and PVD additional elements. An ALD process can then be developed to provide the desired layers, replacing the ALD and PVD combination.